Literature DB >> 20803482

Links between analysis of surrogate endpoints and endogeneity.

Debashis Ghosh1, Michael R Elliott, Jeremy M G Taylor.   

Abstract

There has been substantive interest in the assessment of surrogate endpoints in medical research. These are measures that could potentially replace 'true' endpoints in clinical trials and lead to studies that require less follow-up. Recent research in the area has focused on assessments using causal inference frameworks. Beginning with a simple model for associating the surrogate and true endpoints in the population, we approach the problem as one of endogenous covariates. An instrumental variables estimator and general two-stage algorithm are proposed. Existing surrogacy frameworks are then evaluated in the context of the model. In addition, we define an extended relative effect estimator as well as a sensitivity analysis for assessing what we term the treatment instrumentality assumption. A numerical example is used to illustrate the methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803482      PMCID: PMC2997195          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  19 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments.

Authors:  M Buyse; G Molenberghs; T Burzykowski; D Renard; H Geys
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  On meta-analytic assessment of surrogate outcomes.

Authors:  M H Gail; R Pfeiffer; H C Van Houwelingen; R J Carroll
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  A measure of the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Extended instrumental variables estimation for overall effects.

Authors:  Marshall M Joffe; Dylan Small; Thomas Ten Have; Steve Brunelli; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments.

Authors:  Jay Bhattacharya; Dana Goldman; Daniel McCaffrey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Counterfactual links to the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Yue Wang; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria.

Authors:  R L Prentice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  5 in total

1.  A unified procedure for meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  James Y Dai; James P Hughes
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A causal framework for surrogate endpoints with semi-competing risks data.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 0.870

3.  Rejoinder for "Meta-analysis for surrogacy: accelerated failure time models and semi-competing risks modelling"

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation.

Authors:  Donna L Coffman; Wei Zhong
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-08-20

Review 5.  Informed decision-making: Statistical methodology for surrogacy evaluation and its role in licensing and reimbursement assessments.

Authors:  Christopher J Weir; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.