OBJECTIVES: To examine both the reliability and the validity of the 'Medical Outcomes Study HIV' (MOS-HIV) health survey among HIV-infected patients in Taiwan. METHODS: Data were collected from 619 HIV-infected outpatients, with the reliability and the validity of the MOS-HIV survey subsequently being examined by multi-trait scaling techniques, internal consistency, convergent validity, known-group validity and factorial validity. RESULTS: The MOS-HIV health survey was found to have excellent success rates in the item-consistency and discriminant-validity tests, as well as good convergent validity and known-group validity. An acceptable fit was found for three of the four indices in the original two-factor model (non-normed fit index = 0.92, comparative fit index = 0.94 and standardized root mean squared residual = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study provide strong evidence in support of the reliability and validity of the MOS-HIV health survey for the assessment of quality of life among HIV-infected patients in Taiwan. We find that the original factor structure of the MOS-HIV survey remains valid for patients from Chinese cultural backgrounds. This study therefore contributes to the existing evidence within the extant literature on the cultural relevance of the MOS-HIV health survey (a measure originally developed within a Western culture) as a valid measure for cross-cultural comparative studies on health-related quality of life.
OBJECTIVES: To examine both the reliability and the validity of the 'Medical Outcomes Study HIV' (MOS-HIV) health survey among HIV-infectedpatients in Taiwan. METHODS: Data were collected from 619 HIV-infected outpatients, with the reliability and the validity of the MOS-HIV survey subsequently being examined by multi-trait scaling techniques, internal consistency, convergent validity, known-group validity and factorial validity. RESULTS: The MOS-HIV health survey was found to have excellent success rates in the item-consistency and discriminant-validity tests, as well as good convergent validity and known-group validity. An acceptable fit was found for three of the four indices in the original two-factor model (non-normed fit index = 0.92, comparative fit index = 0.94 and standardized root mean squared residual = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study provide strong evidence in support of the reliability and validity of the MOS-HIV health survey for the assessment of quality of life among HIV-infectedpatients in Taiwan. We find that the original factor structure of the MOS-HIV survey remains valid for patients from Chinese cultural backgrounds. This study therefore contributes to the existing evidence within the extant literature on the cultural relevance of the MOS-HIV health survey (a measure originally developed within a Western culture) as a valid measure for cross-cultural comparative studies on health-related quality of life.
Authors: Darren J Clayson; Diane J Wild; Paul Quarterman; Isabelle Duprat-Lomon; Maria Kubin; Stephen Joel Coons Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: C C Carpenter; D A Cooper; M A Fischl; J M Gatell; B G Gazzard; S M Hammer; M S Hirsch; D M Jacobsen; D A Katzenstein; J S Montaner; D D Richman; M S Saag; M Schechter; R T Schooley; M A Thompson; S Vella; P G Yeni; P A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-01-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Patrizia Schifano; Piero Borgia; Albert W Wu; Teresa Spadea; Giuseppe Milanese; Carlo A Perucci Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Xiaoming Li; Shan Qiao; Xueying Yang; Sayward E Harrison; Cheuk Chi Tam; Zhiyong Shen; Yuejiao Zhou Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-03-29