Carsten Herskind1, Frederik Wenz. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. carsten.herskind@medma.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of the tumor bed in early breast cancer is presently performed with a single dose of 50-kV X-rays from a miniaturized X-ray machine using spherical applicators. The purpose was to model the biological effect of hypofractionated accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) with ten fractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) was estimated from the linear-quadratic (L-Q) formalism including repair of sublethal damage or assuming a constant RBE = 1.2-1.5. The radial distribution of biological effect was assessed from clinical dose-response curves. In accordance with clinical convention, the dose for APBI was prescribed at 1 cm depth in the tumor bed, whereas for IORT it was prescribed at the applicator surface. RESULTS: The fraction size was fitted to give the same risk of late normal-tissue reaction (fibrosis) as single-dose IORT with a maximum dose of 20 Gy. The isoeffective fraction size at 1 cm depth varied between 1.01 Gy for RBE estimated from the L-Q model and 1.64 Gy for constant RBE. The applicator size and dose prescription point influenced the radial dose distribution. The "sphere of equivalence" within which the risk for local recurrence is the same for whole-breast radiotherapy was predicted to extend to 11-15 mm distance from the applicator for alpha/beta = 10 Gy and 9-13 mm for alpha/beta = 4 Gy for hypofractionated APBI, representing an increase of the sphere of equivalence by 2.5-6 mm relative to single-dose IORT. CONCLUSION: An increase of the therapeutic window with hypofractionated APBI relative to single-dose IORT should be feasible.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of the tumor bed in early breast cancer is presently performed with a single dose of 50-kV X-rays from a miniaturized X-ray machine using spherical applicators. The purpose was to model the biological effect of hypofractionated accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) with ten fractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) was estimated from the linear-quadratic (L-Q) formalism including repair of sublethal damage or assuming a constant RBE = 1.2-1.5. The radial distribution of biological effect was assessed from clinical dose-response curves. In accordance with clinical convention, the dose for APBI was prescribed at 1 cm depth in the tumor bed, whereas for IORT it was prescribed at the applicator surface. RESULTS: The fraction size was fitted to give the same risk of late normal-tissue reaction (fibrosis) as single-dose IORT with a maximum dose of 20 Gy. The isoeffective fraction size at 1 cm depth varied between 1.01 Gy for RBE estimated from the L-Q model and 1.64 Gy for constant RBE. The applicator size and dose prescription point influenced the radial dose distribution. The "sphere of equivalence" within which the risk for local recurrence is the same for whole-breast radiotherapy was predicted to extend to 11-15 mm distance from the applicator for alpha/beta = 10 Gy and 9-13 mm for alpha/beta = 4 Gy for hypofractionated APBI, representing an increase of the sphere of equivalence by 2.5-6 mm relative to single-dose IORT. CONCLUSION: An increase of the therapeutic window with hypofractionated APBI relative to single-dose IORT should be feasible.
Authors: Roland Reitsamer; Felix Sedlmayer; Michael Kopp; Gerhard Kametriser; Christian Menzel; Heinz Deutschmann; Olaf Nairz; Wolfgang Hitzl; Florentia Peintinger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Richard B Wilder; Lisa D Curcio; Rajesh K Khanijou; Martin E Eisner; Jane L Kakkis; Lucy Chittenden; Jeffrey Agustin; Jessica Lizarde; Albert V Mesa; John Ravera; Kenneth M Tokita Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2009-09-06 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Benjamin D Smith; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas A Buchholz; Bruce G Haffty; Carol A Hahn; Patricia H Hardenbergh; Thomas B Julian; Lawrence B Marks; Dorin A Todor; Frank A Vicini; Timothy J Whelan; Julia White; Jennifer Y Wo; Jay R Harris Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Linthorst; A N van Geel; E A Baartman; S B Oei; W Ghidey; G C van Rhoon; J van der Zee Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Frederik Wenz; Felix Sedlmayer; Carsten Herskind; Grit Welzel; Elena Sperk; Christian Neumaier; Benjamin Gauter-Fleckenstein; Jayant S Vaidya; Marc Sütterlin Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Muhammad Hammad Aziz; Frank Schneider; Sven Clausen; Elena Blank; Carsten Herskind; Muhammad Afzal; Frederik Wenz Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Felix Sedlmayer; Roland Reitsamer; Christoph Fussl; Ingrid Ziegler; Franz Zehentmayr; Heinz Deutschmann; Peter Kopp; Gerd Fastner Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2014-09-02
Authors: Frank A Giordano; Stefanie Brehmer; Yasser Abo-Madyan; Grit Welzel; Elena Sperk; Anke Keller; Frank Schneider; Sven Clausen; Carsten Herskind; Peter Schmiedek; Frederik Wenz Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 4.430