Literature DB >> 20803240

Development of 95-gene classifier as a powerful predictor of recurrences in node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients.

Yasuto Naoi1, Kazuki Kishi, Tomonori Tanei, Ryo Tsunashima, Naoomi Tominaga, Yosuke Baba, Seung Jin Kim, Tetsuya Taguchi, Yasuhiro Tamaki, Shinzaburo Noguchi.   

Abstract

Our aim was to develop an accurate diagnostic system using gene expression analysis by means of DNA microarray for prognosis of node-negative and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients in order to identify a subset of patients who can be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy. A diagnostic system comprising a 95-gene classifier was developed for predicting the prognosis of node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients by using already published DNA microarray (gene expression) data (n = 549) as the training set and the DNA microarray data (n = 105) obtained at our institute as the validation set. Performance of the 95-gene classifier was compared with that of conventional prognostic factors as well as of the genomic grade index (GGI) based on the expression of 70 genes. With the 95-gene classifier we could classify the 105 patients in the validation set into a high-risk (n = 44) and a low-risk (n = 61) group with 10-year recurrence-free survival rates of 93 and 53%, respectively (P = 8.6e-7). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the 95-gene classifier was the most important and significant predictor of recurrence (P = 9.6e-4) independently of tumor size, histological grade, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, or GGI. The 95-gene classifier developed by us can predict the prognosis of node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients with high accuracy. The 95-gene classifier seems to perform better than the GGI. As many as 58% of the patients classified into the low-risk group with this classifier could be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803240     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1145-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  13 in total

1.  Multi-level gene expression signatures, but not binary, outperform Ki67 for the long term prognostication of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicholas P Tobin; Linda S Lindström; Joseph W Carlson; Judith Bjöhle; Jonas Bergh; Kristian Wennmalm
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Application of a 70-Gene Expression Profile to Japanese Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hideo Shimizu; Yoshiya Horimoto; Atsushi Arakawa; Hiroshi Sonoue; Mami Kurata; Taijiro Kosaka; Katsuya Nakai; Takanori Himuro; Emi Tokuda; Yuka Takahashi; Fumi Taira; Mayuko Ito; Ikuko Abe; Koji Senuma; Lisette Stork-Sloots; Femke de Snoo; Mitsue Saito
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Prognostic microRNA/mRNA signature from the integrated analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Volinia; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A 95-gene signature stratifies recurrence risk of invasive disease in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer with intermediate 21-gene signature recurrence scores.

Authors:  Takeo Fujii; Hiroko Masuda; Yee Chung Cheng; Fei Yang; Aysegul A Sahin; Yasuto Naoi; Yuki Matsunaga; Akshara Raghavendra; Arup Kumar Sinha; Jose Rodrigo Espinosa Fernandez; Anjali James; Keisuke Yamagishi; Tomoko Matsushima; Robert Schuetz; Debu Tripathy; Sachiyo Tada; Rubie S Jackson; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Seigo Nakamura; Jared D Acoba; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Recognising the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an opportunity to target improvement.

Authors:  C O'Donoghue; L Esserman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  PCM-SABRE: a platform for benchmarking and comparing outcome prediction methods in precision cancer medicine.

Authors:  Noah Eyal-Altman; Mark Last; Eitan Rubin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Novel rapid-immunohistochemistry using an alternating current electric field for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kaori Terata; Hajime Saito; Hiroshi Nanjo; Yuko Hiroshima; Satoru Ito; Kasumi Narita; Yoichi Akagami; Ryuta Nakamura; Hayato Konno; Aki Ito; Satoru Motoyama; Yoshihiro Minamiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Promoter methylation of TRIM9 as a marker for detection of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Chieko Mishima; Naofumi Kagara; Saki Matsui; Tomonori Tanei; Yasuto Naoi; Masafumi Shimoda; Atsushi Shimomura; Kenzo Shimazu; Seung Jin Kim; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-22

9.  Endocrine sensitivity of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is negatively correlated with aspartate-β-hydroxylase expression.

Authors:  Masafumi Shimoda; Ami Hori; Jack R Wands; Ryo Tsunashima; Yasuto Naoi; Tomohiro Miyake; Tomonori Tanei; Naofumi Kagara; Kenzo Shimazu; Seung Jin Kim; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  Radiogenomics of magnetic resonance imaging and a new multi-gene classifier for predicting recurrence prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Yukiko Tokuda; Masahiro Yanagawa; Kaori Minamitani; Yasuto Naoi; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.