Literature DB >> 20803157

L5-S1 disc replacement after two previous fusion surgeries for scoliosis.

Shah Jehan1, Sherief Elsayed, John Webb, Bronek Boszczyk.   

Abstract

Following scoliosis surgery, lumbar motion segment degeneration below the level of fusion is not uncommon. Especially long fusions extending to the mid and lower lumbar spine increase the likelihood of degeneration of the remaining motion segments. The management for these patients is controversial and depends on the clinical presentation and level of degeneration. The increasing confidence in motion-preserving technology leads to a dilemma on whether to fuse the remaining lumbar levels or risk utilising disc arthroplasty to preserve the remaining motion segments and facilitate coronal balance in patients with previous long fusion for scoliosis. We present an interesting case of a 44-year-old lady, who underwent two-stage corrective surgery for progressive idiopathic scoliosis at the age of 22 years. In the first stage, she had T11-L3 anterior fusion, whilst in the second stage posterior fusion was done from T5 to L3. At 22 years after the initial surgery, she presented with worsening low back pain and bilateral L4 radicular symptoms. MRI scan confirmed severe disc degeneration at L3-4 and L5-S1 levels with preserved L4-5 disc. She initially underwent L3-L4 decompression and posterolateral fusion at that level, which relieved her radicular symptoms. However, she had persistent pain at the lumbosacral junction with Modic I changes. The options of an anterior L5-S1 fusion or disc replacement were considered and discussed with the patient. The disc replacement option was decided upon with the patient, as anterior fusion was judged to increase the risk of coronal imbalance. At the 1-year follow-up, she reported significant improvement in the back pain. The radiographs at 1 year showed satisfactory position and function of the artificial disc replacement. The disc was flexed laterally, accommodating the coronal balance of the spine. We conclude that L5-S1 motion segment can be preserved with artificial disc replacement in patients with previous long fusion for scoliosis surgery. The real difficulty arises when choosing between disc replacement and extension of fusion. In our patient, the disc replacement has worked well so far. However, the disc is clearly at a mechanical disadvantage, and loss of function in the mid- or long term would not be surprising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803157      PMCID: PMC3082672          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1529-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Treatment of scoliosis. An historical perspective.

Authors:  K Y Moen; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M de Kleuver; F C Oner; W C H Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.

Authors:  Paul C McAfee; Bryan W Cunningham; Victor Hayes; Farhan Sidiqi; Michael Dabbah; John C Sefter; Nianbin Hu; Helen Beatson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; E Abe; Y Shimada; K Okuyama; T Suzuki; K Sato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation.

Authors:  Arash Emami; Vedat Deviren; Sigurd Berven; Jason A Smith; Serena S Hu; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to l4, l5, and the sacrum.

Authors:  K R Eck; K H Bridwell; F F Ungacta; K D Riew; M A Lapp; L G Lenke; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman; James Davenport
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis.

Authors:  J P Kostuik; B B Hall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Svante Berg; Tycho Tullberg; Björn Branth; Claes Olerud; Hans Tropp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  3 in total

1.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

2.  Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc.

Authors:  Karin Büttner-Janz; Richard D Guyer; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

3.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.