Literature DB >> 20802371

A longitudinal study on auditory perception and speech intelligibility in deaf children implanted younger than 18 months in comparison to those implanted at later ages.

Leo De Raeve1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to measure longitudinally the progress in the auditory performance and speech intelligibility of young deaf children implanted under the age of 18 months in comparison to those implanted after 18 months and to create normative data on these children implanted under 18 months. STUDY
DESIGN: : This is a retrospective longitudinal study based on data available at our centre 'KIDS-Hasselt-Belgium'. PATIENTS: 52 deaf children who received a cochlear implant under the age of 18 months.
METHODS: LiP (Listening Progress profile) and CAP (Categories of Auditory Performance) were administered to measure auditory perception and SIR (Speech Intelligibility Rating) was used to measure speech intelligibility. Over a 4 year period, six assessments were made to monitor the auditory and speech development of the children: a pre-test before implantation and five post-tests at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after implantation.
RESULTS: Deaf children receiving cochlear implants before the age of 18 months show more rapid progress in auditory performance and speech intelligibility in comparison to children implanted at an older age. Their auditory performance and speech intelligibility also reach a higher level 4 years after implantation compared with children implanted later in life. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: This study shows encouraging results in the cochlear implantation of children under the age of 18 months. As demonstrated, using the LiP, CAP and SIR measures, children who receive a cochlear implant before the age of 18 months show, that at 3 to 4 years after implantation, significantly greater improvement is made in auditory perception and speech intelligibility than their later implanted peers, although there is a considerable variety in the outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20802371     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f1cde3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  12 in total

1.  Outcome of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations.

Authors:  Jesper Bille; Vibeke Fink-Jensen; Therese Ovesen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Cochlear implantation: a changing indication].

Authors:  T Stark; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Effect of auditory feedback on speech intelligibility of adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R Priner; C Cranial; C Chayat; R Fraenkel; Devora Brand
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Functional Outcomes in Cochleostomy and Round Window Insertion Technique: Difference or No Difference?

Authors:  Meenakashi Rajput; Ajith Nilakantan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 5.  Instruments to assess the oral language of children fitted with a cochlear implant: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mariane Perin da Silva; Ademir Antonio Comerlatto Junior; Maria Cecília Bevilacqua; Simone Aparecida Lopes-Herrera
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Preliminary findings on associations between moral emotions and social behavior in young children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Lizet Ketelaar; Carin H Wiefferink; Johan H M Frijns; Evelien Broekhof; Carolien Rieffe
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Validation of a Cochlear Implant Patient-Specific Model of the Voltage Distribution in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Daniel Schurzig; Andreas Büchner; Richard T Penninger; Waldemar Würfel
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-23

8.  Accessibility to cochlear implants in Belgium: state of the art on selection, reimbursement, habilitation, and outcomes in children and adults.

Authors:  Leo De Raeve; Annelies Wouters
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03

9.  Prospective cohort study reveals MMP-9, a neuroplasticity regulator, as a prediction marker of cochlear implantation outcome in prelingual deafness treatment.

Authors:  Monika Matusiak; Dominika Oziębło; Monika Ołdak; Emilia Rejmak; Leszek Kaczmarek; Piotr Henryk Skarżyński; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Visual Cross-Modal Re-Organization in Children with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.