S Rochet1, L Obert, D Lepage, B Lemaire, G Leclerc, P Garbuio. 1. Orthopaedics, Traumatology, plastic and reconstructive surgery and Hand salvage Department, EA 4268 Innovation, Imaging, Engineering and Healthcare policy Division, IFR 133 Inserm, Innovation and Surgical Technique sub-unit, Jean Minjoz Teaching hospital Center, Franche Comté University, Besançon, France. s.rochet@yahoo.fr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Comminuted fractures of the proximal ulna are severe injuries often associated with bone and ligament injuries of the elbow joint (Monteggia lesion, radial head fractures, dislocation of the elbow). The treatment of these fractures is very demanding and the functional results often fairly mediocre due to associated injuries. Based on a single-center retrospective study, we report the results of the treatment of these fractures fixed using a double-plate technique. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of this fixation mode and to compare it with other fractures series using a single plate fixation (in terms of bone union, elbow joint function, and complications stemming from the plates). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients sustained a comminuted proximal ulna fracture between 2002 and 2006. The fractures were associated in five cases with a Monteggia type lesion, in two cases with elbow dislocation, and in four cases with a Mason 3 radial head fracture. Four patients had an open fracture. These comminuted ulna fractures included nine Mayo Clinic IIIB fractures. Bone fixation was performed with two third-cylinder tubular plates, one plate on each side of the proximal ulna. This allows more versatile solutions for screw insertion. Functional assessment (according to Broberg and Morrey) and radiological evaluation (bone healing) were provided at 6 months and at the longest follow-up by an independent surgeon. RESULTS: Sixteen of 18 patients achieved bone union. No septic complications occurred and no hardware removal was required on patient request. In 67% of the cases, the Morrey score indicated excellent or good results with a mean score of 82. DISCUSSION: There are no reports in the literature on the technical point of fixation concerning complex fractures of the ulna. Two plates mean the possibility of twice the number of screw insertions for epiphyseal reconstruction . This fixation remains easy to perform and provides stable anatomic reconstruction of the ulna. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.
INTRODUCTION: Comminuted fractures of the proximal ulna are severe injuries often associated with bone and ligament injuries of the elbow joint (Monteggia lesion, radial head fractures, dislocation of the elbow). The treatment of these fractures is very demanding and the functional results often fairly mediocre due to associated injuries. Based on a single-center retrospective study, we report the results of the treatment of these fractures fixed using a double-plate technique. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of this fixation mode and to compare it with other fractures series using a single plate fixation (in terms of bone union, elbow joint function, and complications stemming from the plates). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients sustained a comminuted proximal ulna fracture between 2002 and 2006. The fractures were associated in five cases with a Monteggia type lesion, in two cases with elbow dislocation, and in four cases with a Mason 3 radial head fracture. Four patients had an open fracture. These comminuted ulna fractures included nine Mayo Clinic IIIB fractures. Bone fixation was performed with two third-cylinder tubular plates, one plate on each side of the proximal ulna. This allows more versatile solutions for screw insertion. Functional assessment (according to Broberg and Morrey) and radiological evaluation (bone healing) were provided at 6 months and at the longest follow-up by an independent surgeon. RESULTS: Sixteen of 18 patients achieved bone union. No septic complications occurred and no hardware removal was required on patient request. In 67% of the cases, the Morrey score indicated excellent or good results with a mean score of 82. DISCUSSION: There are no reports in the literature on the technical point of fixation concerning complex fractures of the ulna. Two plates mean the possibility of twice the number of screw insertions for epiphyseal reconstruction . This fixation remains easy to perform and provides stable anatomic reconstruction of the ulna. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.
Authors: Hongfei Qi; Zhong Li; Shuai Ji; Ming Li; Yao Lu; Teng Ma; Bing Du; Qiang Huang; Kun Zhang; Yanling Yang Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht; A-M Kladny; M M Paul; L Eden; M Buesse; R H Meffert Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 3.067