Literature DB >> 20801680

Therapeutic options for carotid in-stent restenosis: review of the literature.

Anne C van Haaften1, Michiel L Bots, Frans L Moll, Gert J de Borst.   

Abstract

To critically evaluate published evidence on therapeutic options for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stent (CAS) placement, a systematic analysis of studies reporting interventions for ISR after CAS placement was conducted. In total 20 studies were found, describing 100 interventions after carotid ISR in 96 patients. The interventions most performed were repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA; n = 54), repeat CAS placement (n = 31), and carotid endarterectomy with stent removal (n = 9). No periprocedural complications were identified in any of the studies evaluated. Recurrent restenosis after intervention for ISR occurred in 12 of 84 cases (14%). All 12 patients received tertiary treatment. Two patients developed a third recurrence and eventually disabling stroke, one of whom died. In the other 10 interventions, no further follow-up was described. In conclusion, several treatment strategies for ISR after CAS placement have been reported, with acceptable short-term results. The quality of the currently available data is still limited by the variability of results and study designs. Therefore, no recommendation can be made for any specific therapy. This argues for better study design and more consistency of reporting standards.
Copyright © 2010 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20801680     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  7 in total

1.  In-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of carotid artery stenoses: a long-term follow-up of a single center cohort.

Authors:  J Kammler; H Blessberger; T Lambert; J Kellermair; M Grund; A Nahler; M Lichtenauer; S Schwarz; C Reiter; C Steinwender; A Kypta
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Recurrent stenosis following carotid artery stenting treated with a drug-eluting balloon: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  C Pohlmann; J Höltje; M Zeile; F Bonk; P P Urban; R Brüning
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Katrin Wasser; Sonja Schnaudigel; Janin Wohlfahrt; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Peter Schramm; Michael Knauth; Klaus Gröschel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Percutaneous Treatment of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report and State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Gioia; Cosimo Marco Campanale; Simona Mega; Laura Ragni; Antonio Creta; Germano Di Sciascio
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-21

5.  Carotid endarterectomy for in-stent restenosis: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Baofeng Xu; Rui Liu; Liqun Jiao; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-06-23

6.  Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS).

Authors:  Łukasz Tekieli; Piotr Musiałek; Anna Kabłak-Ziembicka; Mariusz Trystuła; Tadeusz Przewłocki; Jacek Legutko; Karolina Dzierwa; Damian Maciejewski; Michał Michalski; Piotr Pieniążek
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 1.426

7.  Carotid endarterectomy for treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis: long-term follow-up results and surgery experiences from one single centre.

Authors:  Le-Bao Yu; Wei Yan; Qian Zhang; Ji-Zong Zhao; Yan Zhang; Rong Wang; Jun-Shi Shao; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2017-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.