OBJECTIVES: To describe the lessons learned in the initial development of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System social function item banks. DESIGN: Development and testing of 2 item pools within a general population to create item banks that measure ability to participate and satisfaction with participation in social activities. SETTING: Administration via the Internet. PARTICIPANTS: General population members (N=956) of a national polling organization registry participated; data for 768 and 778 participants were used in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of ability to participate and satisfaction with participation in social activities. RESULTS: Fifty-six items measuring the ability to participate were essentially unidimensional but did not fit an item response theory model. As a result, item banks were not developed for these items. Of the 56 items measuring satisfaction with participation, 14 items measuring social roles and 12 items measuring discretionary activities were unidimensional and met item response theory model assumptions. Two 7-item short forms were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: Four lessons, mostly concerning item content, were learned in the development of banks measuring social function. These lessons led to item revisions that are being tested in subsequent studies. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the lessons learned in the initial development of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System social function item banks. DESIGN: Development and testing of 2 item pools within a general population to create item banks that measure ability to participate and satisfaction with participation in social activities. SETTING: Administration via the Internet. PARTICIPANTS: General population members (N=956) of a national polling organization registry participated; data for 768 and 778 participants were used in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of ability to participate and satisfaction with participation in social activities. RESULTS: Fifty-six items measuring the ability to participate were essentially unidimensional but did not fit an item response theory model. As a result, item banks were not developed for these items. Of the 56 items measuring satisfaction with participation, 14 items measuring social roles and 12 items measuring discretionary activities were unidimensional and met item response theory model assumptions. Two 7-item short forms were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: Four lessons, mostly concerning item content, were learned in the development of banks measuring social function. These lessons led to item revisions that are being tested in subsequent studies. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Liana D Castel; Kelly A Williams; Hayden B Bosworth; Susan V Eisen; Elizabeth A Hahn; Debra E Irwin; Morgen A R Kelly; Jennifer Morse; Angela Stover; Darren A DeWalt; Robert F DeVellis Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Stephen C L Lau; Stephanie Judycki; Mikayla Mix; Olivia DePaul; Rachel Tomazin; Angela Hardi; Alex W K Wong; Carolyn Baum Journal: Am J Occup Ther Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Elizabeth A Hahn; Jennifer L Beaumont; Paul A Pilkonis; Sofia F Garcia; Susan Magasi; Darren A DeWalt; David Cella Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: F J Drummond; H Kinnear; C Donnelly; E O'Leary; K O'Brien; R M Burns; A Gavin; L Sharp Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eva van der Meij; Judith Af Huirne; Esther Va Bouwsma; Johanna M van Dongen; Caroline B Terwee; Peter M van de Ven; Chantal M den Bakker; Suzan van der Meij; W Marchien van Baal; Wouter Kg Leclercq; Peggy Maj Geomini; Esther Cj Consten; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul Jm van Kesteren; Hein Bac Stockmann; A Dorien Ten Cate; Paul Hp Davids; Petrus C Scholten; Baukje van den Heuvel; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Wilhelmus Jhj Meijerink; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes R Anema Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-12-21
Authors: Nicolette Gabel; David B Altshuler; Amanda Brezzell; Emily M Briceño; Nicholas R Boileau; Zachary Miklja; Karen Kluin; Thomas Ferguson; Kaitlin McMurray; Lin Wang; Sean R Smith; Noelle E Carlozzi; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Adam W Glaser; Lorna K Fraser; Jessica Corner; Richard Feltbower; Eva J A Morris; Greg Hartwell; Mike Richards; Richard Wagland Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 2.692