Literature DB >> 20800298

Long term results of ossiculoplasties with partial and total titanium Vario Kurz prostheses in children.

S Quesnel1, N Teissier, P Viala, V Couloigner, T Van Den Abbeele.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the efficacy of the Kurz titanium prostheses for total or partial ossicular reconstruction in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for 71 consecutive children who underwent 74 ossicular reconstructions with Kurz prostheses between December 1999 and October 2007 (27 PORP and 47 TORP). Audiological parameters using four-frequency averages (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Clinical and audiometric follow-up times were respectively 33±18.6 and 30±17.7 months (mean±SD).
RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of all patients achieved an air bone gap (ABG) ≤20 dB, 53.8% in the PORP group and 51.1% in the TORP group. The improvement of the mean ABG was 13.3 dB, 9.4 dB for PORP and 14.6 dB for TORP. Overall mean pure tone averages improved 13.2±1.8 dB (mean±SEM) with 10±2.7 dB for PORP and 15±2.4 dB for TORP. The sensory neural hearing loss rate was 1.4% (one TORP) and the extrusion rate was 2.7% (n=2/74).
CONCLUSION: The success rate (ABG≤20 dB) and the pure tone averages were not different between PORP and TORP. Kurz titanium ossicular prostheses offer high biocompatibility and high stability with low complication rates in pediatric ossicular reconstruction.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20800298     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  9 in total

1.  The use of bone cement for ossicular chain defects.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcioglu; Mehmet Tan; Jelle Fleerakkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiqian Yu; Yingzi He; Yusu Ni; Yunfeng Wang; Na Lu; Huawei Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Evaluation on shear bond strength of different glass ionomer and hydroxy apatite cements used in ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcıoğlu; İsmail Hakkı Uzun; Muhammet Yalçın; Meral Arslan Malkoç; Ayşe Tuba Öğreten; Fatih Mehmet Hanege
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

4.  Visualisation of passive middle ear implants by cone beam and multi-detector computed tomography: a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  T D Nguyen; S Kösling; R Mlynski; S K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Long-term hearing result using Kurz titanium ossicular implants.

Authors:  Jeanette Hess-Erga; Per Møller; Flemming Slinning Vassbotn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis: A New Fat Interposition Technique.

Authors:  Issam Saliba; Valérie Sabbah; Jackie Bibeau Poirier
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2018-01-03

7.  Surgical reconstruction of the ossicular chain with custom 3D printed ossicular prosthesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Hirsch; Richard L Vincent; David J Eisenman
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2017-07-27

8.  Anatomical and functional results of ossiculoplasty using titanium prosthesis.

Authors:  G Lahlou; G Sonji; D De Seta; I Mosnier; F Y Russo; O Sterkers; D Bernardeschi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Comparison of Titanium vs. Polycel Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Reza Jahangiri; Sareh Roosta
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.