Literature DB >> 20799339

Cranial functional morphology of fossil dogs and adaptation for durophagy in Borophagus and Epicyon (Carnivora, Mammalia).

Zhijie Jack Tseng1, Xiaoming Wang.   

Abstract

Morphological specialization is a complex interplay of adaptation and constraint, as similarly specialized features often evolve convergently in unrelated species, indicating that there are universally adaptive aspects to these morphologies. The evolutionary history of carnivores offers outstanding examples of convergent specialization. Among larger predators, borophagine canids were highly abundant during the tertiary of North America and are regarded as the ecological vicars of Afro-Eurasian hyenas. Borophaginae is an extinct group of 60+ species, the largest forms evolving robust skulls with prominently domed foreheads, short snouts, and hypertrophied fourth premolars. These specializations have been speculated to enhance bone cracking. To test the extent that the skulls of derived borophagines were adapted for producing large bite forces and withstanding the mechanical stresses associated with bone cracking relative to their nonrobust sister clades, we manipulated muscle forces in models of six canid skulls and analyzed their mechanical response using 3D finite element analysis. Performance measures of bite force production efficiency and deformation minimization showed that skulls of derived borophagines Borophagus secundus and Epicyon haydeni are particularly strong in the frontal region; maximum stresses are lower and more evenly distributed over the skull than in other canids. Frontal strength is potentially coupled with a temporalis-driven bite to minimize cranial stress during biting in the two derived genera, as tensile stress incurred by contracting temporalis muscles is dissipated rostro-ventrally across the forehead and face. Comparison of estimated masticatory muscle cross section areas suggests that the temporalis-masseter ratio is not strongly associated with morphological adaptations for bone cracking in Borophagus and Epicyon; larger body size may explain relatively larger temporalis muscles in the latter. When compared with previous studies, the overall cranial mechanics of the derived borophagines is more similar to bone-cracking hyaenids and percrocutids than to their canid relatives, indicating convergence in both morphological form and functional capability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20799339     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  16 in total

1.  Fracture investigation in starch-based foods.

Authors:  C G Skamniotis; Y Patel; M N Charalambides; M Elliott
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  On the evolutionary advantage of multi-cusped teeth.

Authors:  Paul J Constantino; Mark B Bush; Amir Barani; Brian R Lawn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Cranial biomechanics, bite force and function of the endocranial sinuses in Diprotodon optatum, the largest known marsupial.

Authors:  Alana C Sharp; Thomas H Rich
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae.

Authors:  Fay Penrose; Graham J Kemp; Nathan Jeffery
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Model sensitivity and use of the comparative finite element method in mammalian jaw mechanics: mandible performance in the gray wolf.

Authors:  Zhijie Jack Tseng; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Henryk Flashner; Xiaoming Wang; Reyes Enciso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Are cranial biomechanical simulation data linked to known diets in extant taxa? A method for applying diet-biomechanics linkage models to infer feeding capability of extinct species.

Authors:  Zhijie Jack Tseng; John J Flynn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of the terrestrial-aquatic transition on disparity and rates of evolution in the carnivoran skull.

Authors:  Katrina E Jones; Jeroen B Smaers; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Beware the black box: investigating the sensitivity of FEA simulations to modelling factors in comparative biomechanics.

Authors:  Christopher W Walmsley; Matthew R McCurry; Phillip D Clausen; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Comparative Biomechanical Modeling of Metatherian and Placental Saber-Tooths: A Different Kind of Bite for an Extreme Pouched Predator.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; Uphar Chamoli; William C H Parr; Philip Clausen; Ryan Ridgely; Lawrence Witmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Testing adaptive hypotheses of convergence with functional landscapes: a case study of bone-cracking hypercarnivores.

Authors:  Zhijie Jack Tseng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.