Literature DB >> 20799039

Choosing the nephrostomy size after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Marco De Sio1, Riccardo Autorino, Carmelo Quattrone, Francesco Giugliano, Raffaele Balsamo, Massimo D'Armiento.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of nephrostomy tube size on perioperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithtotmy (PCNL).
METHODS: Forty-five well-matched patients with normal renal function were prospectively divided in two nonrandomized groups after uneventful PCNL (to receive either a 22-Fr, group 1 (n = 24 pts), or a 12-Fr nephrostomy tube, group 2 (n = 21 pts)). In all a balloon nephrostomy catheter with detachable funnel (Rüsch Teleflex, Germany) was used. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for measuring the pain was administered 8 and 24 h after the procedure. Postoperative analgesics use (Ketoralac Tromethamine 30 mg), pre- and postoperative Hb, renal function and urinary leaks were registered.
RESULTS: Groups were comparable as demographics and stone characteristics. VAS pain score was significantly higher in group 1 (4.25 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001) only 8 h postoperatively. No significant difference was found in the VAS pain score 24 h p.o. Similarly, analgesics use (1.6 vs. 1.1, P = 0.05), sHb (1.42 vs. 1.21, P = 0.055) and hospital stay (3.8 vs. 3.6, P = 0.63) were not significant between the two groups of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A small bore nephrostomy catheter may reduce pain in the immediate postoperative time. It does not affect blood loss and hospital stay so it can safely be used instead of a large size nephrostomy tube, after uneventful percutaneous procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20799039     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0587-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  9 in total

1.  No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  R Marcovich; A I Jacobson; J Singh; D Shah; A El-Hakim; B R Lee; A D Smith
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients.

Authors:  B Lojanapiwat; S Soonthornphan; S Wudhikarn
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-bore or pigtail catheter?

Authors:  P N Maheshwari; M G Andankar; M Bansal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy.

Authors:  A Skolarikos; G Alivizatos; J J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  G C Bellman; R Davidoff; J Candela; J Gerspach; S Kurtz; L Stout
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless.

Authors:  Mahesh R Desai; Rajesh A Kukreja; Mihir M Desai; Sumeet S Mhaskar; Kishore A Wani; Snehal H Patel; Sharad D Bapat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Hiren S Sodha; Amit A Khandkar; Shabbir Kharodawala; Sunil S Hegde; Manish B Bansal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size.

Authors:  Paul K Pietrow; Brian K Auge; Costas D Lallas; Robert W Santa-Cruz; Glenn E Newman; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  T J Crook; C R Lockyer; S R Keoghane; B H Walmsley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Beyond ESWL: new concepts for definitive stone removal.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Peter Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Re: totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Fatih O Kurtulus; Zafer Tandogdu; Adem Fazlioglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-05-25

Review 3.  Highlights of the university of toronto urology update 2014.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  The use of the amplatz sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does amplatz sheath size matter?

Authors:  Ayhan Karaköse; Ozgu Aydogdu; Yusuf Z Atesci
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-02-10

5.  Nephrostomy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): does nephrostomy tube size matter? Results from the Global PCNL Study from the Clinical Research Office Endourology Society.

Authors:  Luigi Cormio; Glenn Preminger; Christian Saussine; Niels Peter Buchholz; Xiaochun Zhang; Helena Walfridsson; Andreas J Gross; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Preliminary study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on an ambulatory basis.

Authors:  Magdy Ahmed El-Tabey; Osama Abdel-Wahab Abd-Allah; Ahmed Sebaey Ahmed; Ehab Mohammed El-Barky; Yasser Abdel-Sattar Noureldin
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-02-10

7.  Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block for Pain Control After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tao Chen; ZhenQiang Zhu; Jianlong Du
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-01-28

8.  Choosing the appropriate size of Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy-a novel method.

Authors:  Vasudevan Thirugnanasambandam; Deepak David; Kalyanaram Kone; Joseph Philipraj; Abdulrazzak Mossadeq
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.