Literature DB >> 20799016

Technical success rates and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for occluded native hemodialysis fistulas: comparison between thrombotic occlusion and nonthrombotic occlusion.

Shiro Miyayama1, Masashi Yamashiro, Yuichi Yoshie, Miho Okuda, Yoshiko Nakashima, Hiroshi Ikeno, Nobuaki Orito, Naokazu Ueda, Tamayo Kato, Yasuyuki Ushiogi, Osamu Matsui.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the technical success and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for occluded native hemodialysis fistulas caused by thrombotic occlusion (TO) and nonthrombotic occlusion (NTO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort included 96 consecutive occlusions (70 TOs and 26 NTOs) at the forearm. Clinical success and patency rates of endovascular treatment were calculated and compared between the TO and NTO groups.
RESULTS: Overall clinical success rate was 91.6%; and primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 49.6%, 30.7%, and 28.3%, respectively; 73.8%, 48.3%, and 48.3%, respectively; and 80.7%, 72.3%, and 66.2%, respectively. Clinical success rates of the TO and NTO groups were 91.4% and 92.3%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of the TO group were 54.4%, 29.3%, and 25.6%, respectively; 70.7%, 49.4%, and 49.4%, respectively, and 78%, 68.8%, and 64,2%, respectively. Those of the NTO group were 38.9%, 32.4%, and 32.4%, respectively; 81.2%, 47.3%, and 40.6%, respectively; and 87%, 80.3%, and 70.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the clinical success and patency rates of the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Occluded native hemodialysis fistulas were restored with high frequency, without significant differences between clinical success and patency in the TO and NTO groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20799016     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0458-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  16 in total

Review 1.  Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access.

Authors:  Richard J Gray; David Sacks; Louis G Martin; Scott O Trerotola
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Pull-through approach to percutaneous angioplasty of totally occluded common iliac arteries.

Authors:  R Ginsburg; P Thorpe; C R Bowles; A M Wright; L Wexler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Manual thromboaspiration and dilation of thrombosed dialysis access: mid-term results of a simple concept.

Authors:  L Turmel-Rodrigues; M Sapoval; J Pengloan; L Billaux; D Testou; S Hauss; A Mouton; D Blanchard
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Fatal paradoxic embolism during percutaneous thrombolysis of a hemodialysis graft.

Authors:  C A Owens; B Yaghmai; V Aletich; E Benedetti; J Ecanow; D Warner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Cerebral embolism after mechanical thrombolysis of a clotted hemodialysis access.

Authors:  G R Briefel; F Regan; J D Petronis
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Occluded Brescia-cimino hemodialysis fistulas: endovascular treatment with both brachial arterial and venous access using the pull-through technique.

Authors:  Shiro Miyayama; Osamu Matsui; Keiichi Taki; Tetsuya Minami; Rieko Shinmura; Chiharu Ito; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Miki Kobayashi; Yashuyuki Ushiogi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Pulmonary embolism from pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted hemodialysis grafts: urokinase versus heparinized saline.

Authors:  T B Kinney; K Valji; S C Rose; D D Yeung; S B Oglevie; A C Roberts; D M Ward
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Hydrodynamic thrombectomy system versus pulse-spray thrombolysis for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: a multicenter prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  K H Barth; M R Gosnell; A M Palestrant; L G Martin; J B Siegel; T A Matalon; S C Goodwin; P A Neese; T L Swan; R Uflacker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Wallstents and Craggstents in hemodialysis grafts and fistulas: results for selective indications.

Authors:  L A Turmel-Rodrigues; D Blanchard; J Pengloan; M Sapoval; S Baudin; D Testou; A Mouton; M Abaza
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts: long-term experience and comparison of original and current techniques.

Authors:  K Valji; J J Bookstein; A C Roberts; S B Oglevie; C Pittman; M P O'Neill
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

1.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of a non-mainstream venous route to restore an occluded hemodialysis fistula.

Authors:  Shiro Miyayama; Masashi Yamashiro; Masaya Ikuno; Kenichiro Okumura; Miki Yoshida; Tamayo Kato; Yasuyuki Ushiogi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.