Literature DB >> 20798001

What is the best strategy to reduce the burden of occupational asthma and allergy in bakers?

Tim Meijster1, Nick Warren, Dick Heederik, Erik Tielemans.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Insight into the effectiveness of intervention strategies will help realise a decrease in the occupational disease burden from (allergic) respiratory diseases in the bakery population.
OBJECTIVES: To use a simulation model to assess the impact of different intervention strategies on the disease burden of the bakery population over time.
METHODS: A recently developed dynamic population based model was used to prospectively evaluate the impact on disease burden resulting from different intervention strategies. We distinguished interventions based on exposure reductions for flour dust and fungal α-amylase, health surveillance combined with reduction in exposure, and pre-employment screening. MAIN
RESULTS: The impact of most interventions on disease burden was limited, generally less than 50% for lower respiratory symptoms and disabling occupational asthma. Only the rigorous health surveillance strategy, identifying workers who are sensitised or report upper respiratory symptoms and decreasing their individual exposures by 90% shortly after diagnosis, resulted in a decrease of almost 60% in disease burden after 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that different intervention strategies have substantially different impacts on the burden of disease. The time window during which changes occur differs considerably between strategies. This information can assist policy makers in their choice of intervention and gives guidance for achievable reductions in disease burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20798001     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2009.053611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  2 in total

1.  Association of respiratory symptoms and asthma with occupational exposures: findings from a population-based cross-sectional survey in Telemark, Norway.

Authors:  R Abrahamsen; A K M Fell; M V Svendsen; E Andersson; K Torén; P K Henneberger; J Kongerud
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Evaluating uncertainty to strengthen epidemiologic data for use in human health risk assessments.

Authors:  Carol J Burns; J Michael Wright; Jennifer B Pierson; Thomas F Bateson; Igor Burstyn; Daniel A Goldstein; James E Klaunig; Thomas J Luben; Gary Mihlan; Leonard Ritter; A Robert Schnatter; J Morel Symons; Kun Don Yi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.