PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of three different skin care products versus a placebo in reducing the incidence of radiation therapy-induced skin reactions prophylactically. DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: A radiation oncology department at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in the southeastern United States. SAMPLE: 208 women with breast cancer who were to receivewhole breast radiation therapy. METHODS: Patients were invited to participate after radiation therapy was documented as part of their treatment plan. Patients applied a skin care product starting on the first day of treatment and were assessed weekly by their radiation oncology nurse. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Skin reaction score and skin product. FINDINGS: None of the products were statistically better than placebo in preventing skin reactions. Increases in skin reaction over time did not vary with treatment group for the linear (p = 0.16) and nonlinear (p = 0.94) effects of time and for both time components tested together (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Ninety-five percent of women participating in this study experienced a radiation therapy-induced skin reaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The development of guidelines to support safe patient care is encouraged because patients prefer to take action rather than do nothing. However, the findings do not demonstrate improved clinical outcomes with the use of skin care products. Healthcare providers should proactively educate patients about acute skin reactions and self-care strategies to minimize skin breakdown.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of three different skin care products versus a placebo in reducing the incidence of radiation therapy-induced skin reactions prophylactically. DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: A radiation oncology department at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in the southeastern United States. SAMPLE: 208 women with breast cancer who were to receive whole breast radiation therapy. METHODS:Patients were invited to participate after radiation therapy was documented as part of their treatment plan. Patients applied a skin care product starting on the first day of treatment and were assessed weekly by their radiation oncology nurse. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Skin reaction score and skin product. FINDINGS: None of the products were statistically better than placebo in preventing skin reactions. Increases in skin reaction over time did not vary with treatment group for the linear (p = 0.16) and nonlinear (p = 0.94) effects of time and for both time components tested together (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Ninety-five percent of women participating in this study experienced a radiation therapy-induced skin reaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The development of guidelines to support safe patient care is encouraged because patients prefer to take action rather than do nothing. However, the findings do not demonstrate improved clinical outcomes with the use of skin care products. Healthcare providers should proactively educate patients about acute skin reactions and self-care strategies to minimize skin breakdown.
Authors: Rebecca K S Wong; René-Jean Bensadoun; Christine B Boers-Doets; Jane Bryce; Alexandre Chan; Joel B Epstein; Beth Eaby-Sandy; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha R Cohen; Gary Deng; Jillian A Johnson; Matthew Mumber; Dugald Seely; Suzanna M Zick; Lindsay M Boyce; Debu Tripathy Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Songmi Ahn; Kihoon Sung; Hyun Ju Kim; Young Eun Choi; Young Kyu Lee; Jeong Soo Kim; Seul Ki Lee; Joo-Young Roh Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Terence T Sio; Pamela J Atherton; Brandon J Birckhead; David J Schwartz; Jeff A Sloan; Drew K Seisler; James A Martenson; Charles L Loprinzi; Patricia C Griffin; Roscoe F Morton; Jon C Anders; Thomas J Stoffel; Robert E Haselow; Rex B Mowat; Michelle A Neben Wittich; James D Bearden; Robert C Miller Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Raymond Javan Chan; Joan Webster; Bryan Chung; Louise Marquart; Muhtashimuddin Ahmed; Stuart Garantziotis Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Amanda Gomes de Menêses; Paula Elaine Diniz Dos Reis; Eliete Neves Silva Guerra; Graziela De Luca Canto; Elaine Barros Ferreira Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2018-05-07