Literature DB >> 20797698

Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable threatening stimuli.

Lies Notebaert1, Geert Crombez, Stefaan Van Damme, Jan De Houwer, Jan Theeuwes.   

Abstract

Attentional bias to threat is well established, however, the influence of spatial predictability on this attentional bias has never been investigated. Here we investigated how threat affects attentional capture and disengagement when its spatial location is predictable. Using a visual search paradigm, participants were required to identify a target inside one of a variable number of colored circles. One color (Conditioned Stimulus, CS+) was fear-conditioned using an electrocutaneous stimulus at tolerance level. In the experimental group the CS+ was made spatially predictable (occurred more often at one location in the visual display), while this was not the case in the control group. Results showed no complete automatic capture of attention by the CS+, but the experimental group did show more prioritization of the CS+ and less difficulty to disengage from the CS+ than the control group. Of further importance was the finding that the experimental group also attended to the location that was predictive of the CS+, even when no CS+ was presented. Findings are discussed in terms the effects of predictability on anxiety.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20797698     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  4 in total

1.  Trait anxiety and the alignment of attentional bias with controllability of danger.

Authors:  Lies Notebaert; Jessie Veronica Georgiades; Matthew Herbert; Ben Grafton; Sam Parsons; Elaine Fox; Colin MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-21

2.  Spatial and feature-based attention to expressive faces.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; David De Vito; Cody Cushing; Hee Yeon Im; Daniel N Albohn; Reginald B Adams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Impaired attentional disengagement from stimuli matching the contents of working memory in social anxiety.

Authors:  Jun Moriya; Yoshinori Sugiura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Varying expectancies and attention bias in phobic and non-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Tatjana Aue; Raphaël Guex; Léa A S Chauvigné; Hadas Okon-Singer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.