Shuan Dai1, Kent Chow, Andrea Vincent. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Greenlane Clinical Centre, University of Auckland, New Zealand. shuan.dai@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. DESIGN: Retrospective study in a quaternary public neonatal intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 premature infants screened for retinopathy of prematurity. METHODS: Retrospective chart and photo review were performed on participants screened by both serial wide-field digital retinal imaging and concurrent binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Review of captured digital photos was performed independently by a masked reader. Using the binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy findings as the gold standard, the efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging in detecting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity, defined as type 1 prethreshold disease, was determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of wide-field digital retinal imaging in detecting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity. RESULTS: Treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity was detected in 11 infants by both binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy examination and telemedicine images taken at the same visit. Wide-field digital retinal imaging has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 76.2-100%) and a specificity of 97.9% (95% CI: 93.4-99.7%) in detecting infants with treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity. Positive and negative predictive values of wide-field digital retinal imaging were 84.6% (95% CI: 57.8-97.3%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.9-100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Wide-field digital retinal imaging is accurate, reliable and efficient in detecting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity. Incorporating wide-field digital retinal imaging with telemedicine in standard retinopathy of prematurity management can potentially improve delivery, accessibility, quality and cost of retinopathy of prematurity care.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. DESIGN: Retrospective study in a quaternary public neonatal intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 premature infants screened for retinopathy of prematurity. METHODS: Retrospective chart and photo review were performed on participants screened by both serial wide-field digital retinal imaging and concurrent binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Review of captured digital photos was performed independently by a masked reader. Using the binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy findings as the gold standard, the efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging in detecting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity, defined as type 1 prethreshold disease, was determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of wide-field digital retinal imaging in detecting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity. RESULTS: Treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity was detected in 11 infants by both binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy examination and telemedicine images taken at the same visit. Wide-field digital retinal imaging has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 76.2-100%) and a specificity of 97.9% (95% CI: 93.4-99.7%) in detecting infants with treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity. Positive and negative predictive values of wide-field digital retinal imaging were 84.6% (95% CI: 57.8-97.3%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.9-100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Wide-field digital retinal imaging is accurate, reliable and efficient in detecting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity. Incorporating wide-field digital retinal imaging with telemedicine in standard retinopathy of prematurity management can potentially improve delivery, accessibility, quality and cost of retinopathy of prematurity care.
Authors: Michael F Chiang; Michele Melia; Angela N Buffenn; Scott R Lambert; Franco M Recchia; Jennifer L Simpson; Michael B Yang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Hilal Biten; Travis K Redd; Chace Moleta; J Peter Campbell; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jane S Myung; Rony Gelman; Grant D Aaker; Nathan M Radcliffe; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-22 Impact factor: 5.258