AIM: To assess the influences of imaging variation (different photographic angle) on the measurement of retinal vascular fractal dimension (D(f)), using two segmentation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonlinear orthogonal projection segmentation (International Retinal Imaging Software-Fractal, termed IRIS-Fractal) and curvature-based segmentation (Singapore Institute Vessel Assessment-Fractal, termed SIVA-Fractal) methods were used to measure D(f) and were assessed for their reproducibility in detecting retinal vessels of 30 stereoscopic pairs of optic disc color images. Each pair was taken from the same eye with slightly different angles of incidence. Each photograph of the pairs had subtle variations in brightness between areas temporal and nasal to the optic disc. RESULTS: Intragrader reproducibility of D(f) measurement was similar (intraclass correlation 0.81 and 0.96, respectively) for IRIS-Fractal and SIVA-Fractal. Within-image pair Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) of D(f) measurements were moderate for both methods (0.57 and 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both nonlinear orthogonal projection and curvature-based retinal vessel segmentation methods were found to be sensitive to variations in image brightness, resulting from iris shadowing associated with different angle of photographic incidence.
AIM: To assess the influences of imaging variation (different photographic angle) on the measurement of retinal vascular fractal dimension (D(f)), using two segmentation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonlinear orthogonal projection segmentation (International Retinal Imaging Software-Fractal, termed IRIS-Fractal) and curvature-based segmentation (Singapore Institute Vessel Assessment-Fractal, termed SIVA-Fractal) methods were used to measure D(f) and were assessed for their reproducibility in detecting retinal vessels of 30 stereoscopic pairs of optic disc color images. Each pair was taken from the same eye with slightly different angles of incidence. Each photograph of the pairs had subtle variations in brightness between areas temporal and nasal to the optic disc. RESULTS: Intragrader reproducibility of D(f) measurement was similar (intraclass correlation 0.81 and 0.96, respectively) for IRIS-Fractal and SIVA-Fractal. Within-image pair Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) of D(f) measurements were moderate for both methods (0.57 and 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both nonlinear orthogonal projection and curvature-based retinal vessel segmentation methods were found to be sensitive to variations in image brightness, resulting from iris shadowing associated with different angle of photographic incidence.
Authors: Rebecca Broe; Malin L Rasmussen; Ulrik Frydkjaer-Olsen; Birthe S Olsen; Henrik B Mortensen; Tunde Peto; Jakob Grauslund Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Carol Yim-lui Cheung; Ecosse Lamoureux; M Kamran Ikram; M Bayu Sasongko; Jie Ding; Yingfeng Zheng; Paul Mitchell; Jie Jin Wang; Tien Yin Wong Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2012-05-01
Authors: M Kamran Ikram; Carol Y Cheung; Mara Lorenzi; Ronald Klein; Teresa L Z Jones; Tien Yin Wong Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Howard A Crystal; Susan Holman; Yvonne W Lui; Alison E Baird; Hua Yu; Ronald Klein; Diana Marcella Rojas-Soto; Deborah R Gustafson; Glenn T Stebbins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mirna Kirin; Reka Nagy; Thomas J MacGillivray; Ozren Polašek; Caroline Hayward; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Sarah Wild; Alan F Wright; James F Wilson; Veronique Vitart Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Maja Kostic; Nathan M Bates; Nebojsa T Milosevic; Jing Tian; William E Smiddy; Wen-Hsiang Lee; Gabor M Somfai; William J Feuer; Joyce C Shiffman; Ajay E Kuriyan; Ninel Z Gregori; Sandra Pineda; Delia Cabrera DeBuc Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Sarah McGrory; Adele M Taylor; Enrico Pellegrini; Lucia Ballerini; Mirna Kirin; Fergus N Doubal; Joanna M Wardlaw; Alex S F Doney; Baljean Dhillon; John M Starr; Emanuele Trucco; Ian J Deary; Thomas J MacGillivray Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 3.283