Literature DB >> 20795510

Survey of anaphylaxis management by general practitioners in Scotland.

G Lowe1, E Kirkwood, S Harkness.   

Abstract

AIM: To obtain a snapshot of how patients with potentially life-threatening allergies are managed within a Primary Care setting.
METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire-based survey sent to all General Practitioners in Scotland.
RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen replies were suitable for analysis. Ninety percent of respondents had prescribed adrenaline auto-injector pens, almost exclusively the EpiPen device. Less than half were personally confident in their use and only 17% had access to a dummy trainer pen for demonstration purposes. Twenty seven percent would prescribe one auto-injector only. Six percent reported accidental mis-firing of adrenaline pens, although with no serious sequelae. Refusal of pens by patients was noted by 1%. In the event of an anaphylactic emergency, 90% of respondents would use adrenaline as first-line treatment, although only half would use the UK Resuscitation Council recommended adult dose of 0.5mg by the intramuscular route (or 0.3mg by auto-injector). Eleven percent would give adrenaline by the slower subcutaneous route and 3% by the intravenous route. Thirty six percent had themselves treated such a case outside of hospital. Sixty two percent of respondents would seek specialist investigation of anaphylaxis, although only 31% felt that ready access was available. Frequent concerns were raised about current provision of care for patients with allergic disease and their own ability to deal with this.
CONCLUSION: Investment is required, both to provide basic training and ongoing support for Primary healthcare staff in the management of allergic disease, and also for necessary accompanying specialist support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20795510     DOI: 10.1258/rsmsmj.55.3.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scott Med J        ISSN: 0036-9330            Impact factor:   0.729


  6 in total

1.  Epinephrine auto-injector prescriptions to food-allergic patients in primary care in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Jacquelien Saleh-Langenberg; A E J Dubois; F Groenhof; J W H Kocks; T van der Molen; B M J Flokstra-de Blok
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 2.  How to manage anaphylaxis in primary care.

Authors:  Alberto Alvarez-Perea; Luciana Kase Tanno; María L Baeza
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.871

3.  Development of an allergy management support system in primary care.

Authors:  Bertine Mj Flokstra-de Blok; Thys van der Molen; Wianda A Christoffers; Janwillem Wh Kocks; Richard L Oei; Joanne Ng Oude Elberink; Emmy M Roerdink; Marie Louise Schuttelaar; Jantina L van der Velde; Thecla M Brakel; Anthony Ej Dubois
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2017-03-15

4.  Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric Dryver; Jeanette Knutsson; Ulf Ekelund; Anders Bergenfelz
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Continuing medical education programs for primary care physicians from remote locations of Vietnam: a needs assessment.

Authors:  Pham Ngan Giang; Matthew Kelly; Nguyen Thi Tuyet Nhung; Haribondhu Sarma
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  A Simple Allergist-Led Intervention Improves Resident Training in Anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Artemio M Jongco; Sheila Bina; Robert J Sporter; Marie A Cavuoto Petrizzo; Blanka Kaplan; Myriam Kline; Susan J Schuval
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2016-02-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.