Literature DB >> 20795340

Differences in total human chorionic gonadotropin immunoassay analytical specificity and ability to measure human chorionic gonadotropin in gestational trophoblastic disease and germ cell tumors.

Richard A Harvey1, Hugh D C Mitchell, Ulf-Håkan Stenman, M A Blankenstein, Kjell Nustad, Petra Stieber, Wilson Stewart, Philip M Savage, Michael J Seckl, Glenn D Braunstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of several radioimmunoassays and commercial two-site immunoassays to detect the first World Health Organization International Reference Reagents (IRRs) for 6 defined human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) variants and to compare their performance in measuring hCG in sera from patients with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) and germ cell tumors (GCTs) of the testis or ovary. STUDY
DESIGN: The reactivity of the different assays with the 6 IRRs together with the current fourth International Standard (IS, 75/589) was tested using 5 commercial two-site assays as well as 2 competitive polyclonal radioimmunoassays (RIAs) and a competitive monoclonal immunoassay. Individual samples from 41 patients (19 GCT and 22 GTD) with high circulating levels of hCG (range, 718-6,055,000 IU/L) were diluted and measured using the various immunoassays.
RESULTS: The results of 4 GCT patient samples varied markedly among the assays, including 1 sample that was grossly underestimated by 3 of the commercial assays.
CONCLUSION: Comparison of each assay's reactivity to the variant isoforms revealed that recognition of the isoforms was highly variable, particularly for hCGbeta and hCGbeta core fragment (hCGbetacf).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20795340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  7 in total

1.  Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: a profile of Robert L. Goldenberg, MD.

Authors:  Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 10.693

2.  Gestational and Non-gestational Trophoblastic Disease. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/049, December 2015).

Authors:  C Tempfer; L-C Horn; S Ackermann; M W Beckmann; R Dittrich; J Einenkel; A Günthert; H Haase; J Kratzsch; M C Kreissl; S Polterauer; A D Ebert; K T M Schneider; H G Strauss; F Thiel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  A review on management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Seyedeh Reyhaneh Yousefi Sharami; Elham Saffarieh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

4.  Chemotherapy and human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations 6 months after uterine evacuation of molar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Roshan Agarwal; Suliana Teoh; Delia Short; Richard Harvey; Philip M Savage; Michael J Seckl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Quantitative analysis of total β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin concentration in urine by immunomagnetic reduction to assist in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Chen; Yuh-Ming Hwu; Chie-Pein Chen; Chia-Chen Chang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-03-30

6.  Early prediction of treatment resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia using population kinetic modelling of hCG measurements.

Authors:  B You; R Harvey; E Henin; H Mitchell; F Golfier; P M Savage; M Tod; M Wilbaux; G Freyer; M J Seckl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Reduced levels of plasma kisspeptin during the antenatal booking visit are associated with increased risk of miscarriage.

Authors:  C N Jayasena; A Abbara; C Izzi-Engbeaya; A N Comninos; R A Harvey; J Gonzalez Maffe; Z Sarang; Z Ganiyu-Dada; A I Padilha; M Dhanjal; C Williamson; L Regan; M A Ghatei; S R Bloom; W S Dhillo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.