Literature DB >> 20791654

Role of liver scanning in the preoperative evaluation of patients with cancer.

K P Poulose, R C Reba, F H Deland, H N Wagner.   

Abstract

Liver scan characteristics and liver function tests of 72 patients with proved hepatic malignancy (54 metastatic, 18 primary) were evaluated. Well-defined focal defects were observed in 83% of patients with metastatic and 77% of patients with primary liver carcinoma. In 10% of the patients with metastatic liver disease the distribution of radioactivity was normal. Four or more biochemical liver function tests were normal in 33% of metastatic and 29% of primary liver cancer patients. Hepatic enlargement was present in the scan in 94% of the patients with liver metastases; however, data obtained from 104 necropsies of patients with hepatic metastases showed that only 46% had hepatomegaly. We recommend, therefore, that a liver scan should be performed before major tumour surgery in every patient with known malignancy regardless of normal liver size or normal liver function tests.

Entities:  

Year:  1969        PMID: 20791654      PMCID: PMC1630078          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.4.5683.585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  8 in total

1.  A RE-EVALUATION OF NEEDLE BIOPSY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF METASTATIC CANCER OF THE LIVER.

Authors:  H O CONN; R YESNER
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Manifestations of metastatic tumors of the liver. A study of eighty-one patients subjected to needle biopsy.

Authors:  L F FENSTER; G KLATSKIN
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  The serum alkaline phosphatase in chronic infiltrative disease of the liver.

Authors:  A M HARVEY; F L IBER; R S ROSS
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1956-12       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  The natural history of cirrhosis. Experience with an unselected group of patients.

Authors:  W D Stone; N R Islam; A Paton
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1968-01

5.  The false-positive hepatic scan.

Authors:  P M Johnson; W A Sweeney
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The determination of liver mass from radionuclide images.

Authors:  F D Rollo; F H DeLand
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Relationship between liver size and body size.

Authors:  F H DeLand; W A North
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The relative diagnostic accuracy of liver radioactive isotope photoscanning.

Authors:  L B Smith; R D Illims
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1968-05
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Are hepatic scans overused?

Authors:  S N Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1976-08

2.  The early detection of recurrent and metastatic oncological disease.

Authors:  C S Galasko
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1974-09

3.  The clinical value and limitations of liver scanning.

Authors:  P Dovey
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1971-05

Review 4.  Hepatic radionuclide imaging: an effective diagnostic procedure!

Authors:  M A Rothschild
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1976-08

5.  A clinical trial of the value of a tomographic section view to identify liver abnormalities by radionuclide imaging, with special reference to metastatic disease.

Authors:  P P Dendy; W I Keyes; A Reid; P E Undrill; F W Smith; J R Mallard; A F MacDonald
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-02

6.  75se-selenomethionine in the scintiscan diignosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  A L Eddleston; M O Rake; A P Pagaltsos; S B Osborn; R Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 23.059

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.