Literature DB >> 2078985

The effect of electrode position on flash visual evoked potentials in the newborn.

B A Lupton1, P K Wong, R Bencivenga, A Hill.   

Abstract

We examined how changes in electrode position affected the visual evoked potential in 74 high-risk newborns using a multiple electrode technique. The variation in the visual evoked potential across the occiput was documented. Visual evoked potentials that were visible at one occipital electrode position were absent at a different electrode position in 21 of 87 recordings (24%). Changes of greater than 20 msec between electrodes in latency of waves P1 or N2 occurred in 34% and 29% of recordings, respectively. The amplitude of response varied by a factor of 2.36 between mid occipital and lateral occipital electrodes. The results demonstrated that large changes in morphologic characteristics, latency, and amplitude in the visual evoked potential of the newborn result from small changes in the position of recording electrodes. These findings underscored the importance of electrode position and accurate electrode placement. Our observations also indicated that recordings from a single electrode are inadequate in providing an accurate representation of the neonatal visual evoked potential.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2078985     DOI: 10.1007/BF00140500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  Development of visual evoked potentials and photic driving responses in normal full term, low risk premature, and Trisomy-21 infants during the first year of life.

Authors:  R J Ellingson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-04

2.  The effects of maturation and aging on the wave form of visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  R E Dustman; E C Beck
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-01

3.  Follow-up of visual evoked potential in full-term and pre-term control newborns and in subjects who suffered from perinatal respiratory distress.

Authors:  D Gambi; P M Rossini; G Albertini; D Sollazzo; M G Torrioli; G C Polidori
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-05

4.  Clinical application of evoked electroencephalographic responses in newborn infants. I: Perinatal asphyxia.

Authors:  A Hrbek; P Karlberg; I Kjellmer; T Olsson; M Riha
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Event-related potentials in the evaluation of high-risk infants.

Authors:  D Kurtzberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Changes in the visual evoked potentials of hydrocephalic children.

Authors:  A N Guthkelch; R J Sclabassi; J K Vries
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Variability of visual evoked potentials in human infants and adults.

Authors:  R J Ellingson; G H Lathrop; T Danahy; B Nelson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-02

8.  Changes in latency and form of the photically induced average evoked response in human infants.

Authors:  G S Ferriss; G D Davis; M M Dorsen; E R Hackett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-04

9.  The evolution of visual and auditory evoked potentials in infants with perinatal disorder.

Authors:  S Hakamada; K Watanabe; K Hara; S Miyazaki
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.961

10.  VEPs in normal full-term and premature neonates: longitudinal versus cross-sectional data.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R Menzies; L J MacMillan; H E Whyte
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality evoked responses in the neurological assessment of the newborn.

Authors:  E Mercuri; K von Siebenthal; H Daniëls; F Guzzetta; P Casaer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.183

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.