Literature DB >> 2074563

Anaphase lag as the most likely mechanism for monosomy X in direct cytotrophoblasts but not in mesenchymal core cells from the same villi.

M B Qumsiyeh1, A T Tharapel, L P Shulman, J L Simpson, S Elias.   

Abstract

A 36 year old white female was referred for chorionic villus sampling for advanced maternal age. Direct (cytotrophoblast) preparations of chorionic villi were 45,X, but cultured mesenchymal core cells from the same villi were 46,XX. Study of embryonic and extraembryonic tissues showed the aneuploidy to be limited to cytotrophoblasts from specific placental sites. In aggregate, the cytogenetic findings can best be explained by anaphase lag during development of the cytotrophoblast, suggesting that this cytological mechanism and not non-disjunction is responsible for the common occurrence of monosomy X in villi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2074563      PMCID: PMC1017282          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.27.12.780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  6 in total

1.  The predictive value of cytogenetic diagnosis after CVS: 1500 cases.

Authors:  A S Breed; A Mantingh; J R Beekhuis; M D Kloosterman; H ten Bolscher; G J Anders
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Resorbed co-twin as an explanation for discrepant chorionic villus results: non-mosaic 47,XX,+16 in villi (direct and culture) with normal (46,XX) amniotic fluid and neonatal blood.

Authors:  A T Tharapel; S Elias; L P Shulman; L Seely; D S Emerson; J L Simpson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  The European collaborative study on mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: data from 1986 to 1987.

Authors:  L O Vejerslev; M Mikkelsen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Chorionic villus sampling: experience of the first 1000 cases.

Authors:  W A Hogge; S A Schonberg; M S Golbus
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Extra embryonic/fetal karyotypic discordance during diagnostic chorionic villus sampling.

Authors:  D F Callen; G Korban; G Dawson; L Gugasyan; E J Krumins; S Eichenbaum; J Petrass; S Purvis-Smith; A Smith; G Den Dulk
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Cytogenetic results of chorionic villus sampling: high success rate and diagnostic accuracy in the United States collaborative study.

Authors:  D H Ledbetter; A O Martin; Y Verlinsky; E Pergament; L Jackson; T Yang-Feng; S A Schonberg; F Gilbert; J M Zachary; M Barr
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.