Literature DB >> 2074456

Microstimulation mapping of precentral cortex during trained movements.

E M Schmidt1, J S McIntosh.   

Abstract

1. The precentral cortex of three Macaca mulatta monkeys were mapped with intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) while the monkeys performed alternating wrist flexion and extension movements. A forearm cocontraction task was also employed with one monkey. Electromyogram (EMG) recordings from forearm muscles were used to evaluate the results of ICMS. 2. We have found that the results of ICMS can be misleading if EMG activity is not recorded from the responding muscle. Inhibition can be interpreted as excitation if muscle palpation or joint movement are the only response criteria. 3. Movement of the stimulating electrode by as little as 200 microns in a single radial column sometimes changed EMG responses from inhibition to excitation or vice versa, indicating that cortical inhibitory areas for a muscle can be located very close to excitatory zones. 4. Both excitation and inhibition of muscles could be produced with ICMS of precentral cortex when the animal was performing a task involving the muscles being mapped. EMG responses to ICMS were stable, provided that the stimulation was applied at the same time during a repetitive task such that the motoneurons were at a given level of excitability. 5. Zones where ICMS produced inhibition of a particular forearm muscle were interspersed among zones that produced excitation for that muscle. 6. Regions exist in precentral cortex where ICMS activates antagonistic wrist muscles producing cocontraction. 7. The extensive cortical region from which any individual muscle can be activated or suppressed with ICMS and the various combinations of muscles that are activated from within this region suggest that different types of movements involving a single muscle are represented at different locations within this region. 8. At a few locations in precentral cortex, the EMG responses to ICMS were not just a function of the level of excitation of the motoneuron pool at the time of stimulation but were also dependent on the specific task the monkey was performing at the time of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2074456     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.6.1668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Activities of the primary and supplementary motor areas increase in preparation and execution of voluntary muscle relaxation: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  K Toma; M Honda; T Hanakawa; T Okada; H Fukuyama; A Ikeda; S Nishizawa; J Konishi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dissociation of cortical areas responsible for evoking excitatory and inhibitory responses in the small hand muscles.

Authors:  J P Lewko; D S Stokić; I M Tarkka
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Effects of longer vs. shorter timed movement sequences on alpha motor inhibition when combining contractions and relaxations.

Authors:  Nils Flüthmann; Kouki Kato; Oliver Bloch; Kazyuki Kanosue; Tobias Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Differential effects of local inactivation within motor cortex and red nucleus on performance of an elbow task in the cat.

Authors:  J H Martin; S E Cooper; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hijacking cortical motor output with repetitive microstimulation.

Authors:  Darcy M Griffin; Heather M Hudson; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Organization of the forelimb area in squirrel monkey motor cortex: representation of digit, wrist, and elbow muscles.

Authors:  J P Donoghue; S Leibovic; J N Sanes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cortical modulation of transmission in spinal reflex pathways of man.

Authors:  J F Iles; J V Pisini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Differential impairments in reaching and grasping produced by local inactivation within the forelimb representation of the motor cortex in the cat.

Authors:  J H Martin; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Differential joint-specific corticospinal tract projections within the cervical enlargement.

Authors:  Curtis O Asante; John H Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.