OBJECTIVE: Most occupational health physicians access electronic databases to obtain reliable medical information. Although it has been demonstrated that the use of Medline alone does not ensure comprehensiveness, many experts rely solely on this database. Our study aimed to discover to what extent the physician who limits his/her search to Medline misses studies of high quality. METHODS: We constructed a "gold standard" database of high-quality intervention studies gathering all the references included in the systematic reviews of the Cochrane Library and indexed under the topic "occupational health field". We then searched all these references, one by one, in Medline. RESULTS: Overall, 88.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 86.1-91.5] of the high quality studies included in our gold standard database were indexed in Medline. References included in reviews on psychiatric or psychological topics were significantly less often indexed in Medline [81.7% (95% CI 75.9-88.5)] than references included in reviews on other topics [92.2% (95% CI 89.5-95.0)] (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The recall ratio of Medline for high-quality intervention studies is close to 90%. For occupational health practitioners who aim to find reliable answers to their daily practice questions, searching Medline only is more cost-effective than previously thought.
OBJECTIVE: Most occupational health physicians access electronic databases to obtain reliable medical information. Although it has been demonstrated that the use of Medline alone does not ensure comprehensiveness, many experts rely solely on this database. Our study aimed to discover to what extent the physician who limits his/her search to Medline misses studies of high quality. METHODS: We constructed a "gold standard" database of high-quality intervention studies gathering all the references included in the systematic reviews of the Cochrane Library and indexed under the topic "occupational health field". We then searched all these references, one by one, in Medline. RESULTS: Overall, 88.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 86.1-91.5] of the high quality studies included in our gold standard database were indexed in Medline. References included in reviews on psychiatric or psychological topics were significantly less often indexed in Medline [81.7% (95% CI 75.9-88.5)] than references included in reviews on other topics [92.2% (95% CI 89.5-95.0)] (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The recall ratio of Medline for high-quality intervention studies is close to 90%. For occupational health practitioners who aim to find reliable answers to their daily practice questions, searching Medline only is more cost-effective than previously thought.
Authors: Gregorio González-Alcaide; José Manuel Ramos; Charles Huamaní; Carmen de Mendoza; Vicent Soriano Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 1.846
Authors: Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö; Eric Peter Thelin; Marc Maegele; Mikael Svensson; Bo-Michael Bellander Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Stefania Curti; Davide Gori; Valentina Di Gregori; Andrea Farioli; Alberto Baldasseroni; Maria Pia Fantini; David C Christiani; Francesco S Violante; Stefano Mattioli Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Stefania Curti; Stefano Mattioli; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Andrea Farioli; Francesco S Violante Journal: J Occup Health Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Susan Gritzka; Tadhg E MacIntyre; Denise Dörfel; Jordan L Baker-Blanc; Giovanna Calogiuri Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 4.157