Literature DB >> 20739578

The effect of age on the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior and posterior lesions.

Joshua M Alpert1, Thomas H Wuerz, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Kaitlin M Carroll, Nathan N Brucker, Thomas J Gill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of clinical outcome studies of type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) repair assess patients younger than age 40. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is often recommended for patients older than age 40 with superior labrum-biceps complex injury. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference in patient clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic type II SLAP repair in patients younger or older than age 40. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients stratified to groups younger than age 40 (21 patients; average age, 32.9 years) and older than age 40 (31 patients; average age, 55.1 years) were identified at a minimum 2-year follow-up (average, 28 months) after type II SLAP repair by a single surgeon using suture anchors. Outcome scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Society scores (ASES), Short Form-12 scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and visual analog pain scale.
RESULTS: At follow-up, there was no statistical difference in visual analog pain scale (P = .16), ASES scores (P = .07), Simple Shoulder Test scores (P =.41), Short Form-12 testing, or range of motion testing. Patients older than age 40 noted their shoulder to be 87% of normal; 26 of 31 (84%) were satisfied to completely satisfied, and 28 of 31 (90%) would have the surgery again. Patients younger than 40 noted their shoulder to be approximately 89% of normal; 20 of 21 (95%) were satisfied to completely satisfied, and 18 of 21 (86%) would have the same procedure performed again.
CONCLUSION: Our findings support that arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP repair using suture anchors can yield good to excellent results in patients older and younger than age 40. We found no statistically significant difference in patient outcome scores, satisfaction levels, or willingness to have the same procedure again when comparing arthroscopic SLAP repair in patients younger or older than age 40.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739578     DOI: 10.1177/0363546510377741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  Arthroscopic treatment of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions in a younger population: minimum 2-year outcomes are similar between SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Kevin F Dunne; Michael Knesek; Vehniah K Tjong; Brett D Riederman; Charles J Cogan; Hayden P Baker; Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Stephen Gryzlo; Michael A Terry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Trends in Repair vs. Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labrum From Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Tear: An Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Ian S Hong; Joshua D Meade; Bradley L Young; Ziqing Yu; David P Trofa; James E Fleischli; Nady Hamid; Dana Piasecki; Bryan M Saltzman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-21

3.  Is timing of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair important? A cohort study evaluating the effect of the duration of symptoms prior to surgery on the outcomes of patients who underwent type II SLAP repair.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Murphy; Patrick H Lam; George Ac Murrell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 4.  Superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions of the long bicep insertion on the glenoid: management in athletes.

Authors:  Juan Martín Patiño
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 5.  Superior labrum anterior to posterior lesions of the shoulder: Diagnosis and arthroscopic management.

Authors:  Nuri Aydin; Evrim Sirin; Alp Arya
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

6.  SLAP lesions: a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Matthias Brockmeyer; Marc Tompkins; Dieter M Kohn; Olaf Lorbach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Outcomes of Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis for the Treatment of Failed Type II SLAP Repair: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alexander Kreines; Manuel Pontes; Elizabeth Ford; Kristen Herbst; Jeffrey Murray; Brian Busconi; Sean McMillan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-03

8.  Superior labral anterior posterior lesions of the shoulder.

Authors:  Joby Jacob George Malal; Yousaf Khan; Graville Farrar; Mohammed Waseem
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-06

9.  Does age or gender of the patient influence the outcome of type II superior labrum anterior and posterior repair?

Authors:  Daniel Mok; Emily L Wang
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2012-10

10.  Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: Clinical and anatomic follow-up.

Authors:  John N Trantalis; Stephen Sohmer; Kristie D More; Atiba A Nelson; Ben Wong; Corinne H Dyke; Gail M Thornton; Richard S Boorman; Ian K Y Lo
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.