Literature DB >> 20739344

Cytogenetic assessment of heterogeneous radiation doses in cancer patients treated with fractionated radiotherapy.

S Roch-Lefèvre1, F Pouzoulet, A L Giraudet, Pa Voisin, A Vaurijoux, G Gruel, E Grégoire, V Buard, M Delbos, Ph Voisin, J Bourhis, L Roy.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo dose-response relation of chromosome aberration formation and distribution in a context of localised and fractionated radiotherapy. Cytogenetic analysis was applied to eight patients, all treated for the same tumour localisation; the same localisation was used to prevent the variability usually observed between patients treated with radiotherapy and to allow the corresponding roles of the size of irradiation field and of the dose rate to be studied. The yield of dicentrics, centric rings and fragments was measured in blood samples taken before treatment, during the course of radiotherapy and up to 6 months after. After the first fraction of radiotherapy, we observed that the whole-body dose estimated from the yield of dicentrics and rings was higher (0.35+/-0.2 Gy) than the calculated equivalent whole-body dose (0.07+/-0.04 Gy). By contrast, the partial-body dose derived from the Qdr (quotient of dicentrics and rings) model was estimated to be 2.2+/-0.3 Gy, which agreed quite well with the dose delivered to the tumour (2.1+/-0.1 Gy). We also found a correlation between the yield of induced chromosome aberrations and the target field size (p = 0.014). U-value analysis showed that the distribution of dicentrics and rings was overdispersed, despite the fractionation of the exposure, and a positive correlation between the U-value and the dose rate was observed (p = 0.017). Overall, these results suggest that the proportion of undamaged lymphocytes could increase with the dose rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739344      PMCID: PMC3473418          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21022597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Mathematical methods in biological dosimetry: the 1996 Iranian accident.

Authors:  P Voisin; R G Assaei; A Heidary; R Varzegar; F Zakeri; V Durand; I Sorokine-Durm
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Suitability of FISH painting techniques for the detection of partial-body irradiations for biological dosimetry.

Authors:  A Duran; J F Barquinero; M R Caballín; M Ribas; P Puig; J Egozcue; L Barrios
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Chromosome aberration analysis in radiotherapy patients and simulated partial body exposures: biological dosimetry for non-uniform exposures.

Authors:  B Sreedevi; B S Rao; H Nagaraj; N K Pal
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.

Authors:  M S Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of lung cancer patients treated with carbon ions.

Authors:  Ryonfa Lee; Shigeru Yamada; Naoyoshi Yamamoto; Tadaaki Miyamoto; Koichi Ando; Marco Durante; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 6.  Genetic polymorphisms of smoking-related carcinogen detoxifying enzymes and head and neck cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Martin Lacko; Michael B Oude Ophuis; Wilbert H M Peters; Johannes J Manni
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Dose-response relationship of lymphocyte chromosome aberrations in locally irradiated persons.

Authors:  S Matsubara; M S Sasaki; T Adachi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Biological dosimetry in atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  M S Sasaki; H Miyata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Chromosomal aberration in peripheral lymphocytes and doses to the active bone marrow in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard Gershkevitsh; Guido Hildebrandt; Ulrich Wolf; Friedrich Kamprad; Enn Realo; Klaus-Rüdiger Trott
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  The induction of chromosome aberrations during the course of radiation therapy for morbus Hodgkin.

Authors:  A Diener; G Stephan; T Vogl; J Lissner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-Art Advances in Radiation Biodosimetry for Mass Casualty Events Involving Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Mary Sproull; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Relationship between head and neck cancer therapy and some genetic endpoints.

Authors:  Eliana Maria Minicucci; Glenda Nicioli da Silva; Daisy Maria Fávero Salvadori
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10

3.  Prognostic value of the micronucleus assay for clinical endpoints in neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tim Beißbarth; Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Leif Hendrik Dröge; Steffen Hennies; Stephan Lorenzen; Lena-Christin Conradi; Henriette Quack; Torsten Liersch; Christian Helms; Miriam Alice Frank; Markus Anton Schirmer; Margret Rave-Fränk
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The mechanisms of chansu in inducing efficient apoptosis in colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Chun Li; Saeed M Hashimi; Siyu Cao; Albert S Mellick; Wei Duan; David Good; Ming Q Wei
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  A dose-response curve for biodosimetry from a 6 MV electron linear accelerator.

Authors:  M M P Lemos-Pinto; M Cadena; N Santos; T S Fernandes; E Borges; A Amaral
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  The first in vivo multiparametric comparison of different radiation exposure biomarkers in human blood.

Authors:  Ales Tichy; Sylwia Kabacik; Grainne O'Brien; Jaroslav Pejchal; Zuzana Sinkorova; Adela Kmochova; Igor Sirak; Andrea Malkova; Caterina Gomila Beltran; Juan Ramon Gonzalez; Jakub Grepl; Matthaeus Majewski; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Lenka Zarybnicka; Jana Vachelova; Alzbeta Zavrelova; Marie Davidkova; Marketa Markova Stastna; Michael Abend; Eileen Pernot; Elisabeth Cardis; Christophe Badie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.