Literature DB >> 20739248

Forensic utilization of familial searches in DNA databases.

Cassandra J Gershaw1, Andrew J Schweighardt, Linda C Rourke, Margaret M Wallace.   

Abstract

DNA evidence is widely recognized as an invaluable tool in the process of investigation and identification, as well as one of the most sought after types of evidence for presentation to a jury. In the United States, the development of state and federal DNA databases has greatly impacted the forensic community by creating an efficient, searchable system that can be used to eliminate or include suspects in an investigation based on matching DNA profiles - the profile already in the database to the profile of the unknown sample in evidence. Recent changes in legislation have begun to allow for the possibility to expand the parameters of DNA database searches, taking into account the possibility of familial searches. This article discusses prospective positive outcomes of utilizing familial DNA searches and acknowledges potential negative outcomes, thereby presenting both sides of this very complicated, rapidly evolving situation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739248     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  9 in total

1.  Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.

Authors:  Jaehee Kim; Michael D Edge; Bridget F B Algee-Hewitt; Jun Z Li; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Peter de Knijff
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Father figures.

Authors:  Mark A Jobling
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2011-10-06

4.  Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability.

Authors:  Rori V Rohlfs; Stephanie Malia Fullerton; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Analysis of microsatellite polymorphism in inbred knockout mice.

Authors:  Baofen Zuo; Xiaoyan Du; Jing Zhao; Huixin Yang; Chao Wang; Yanhua Wu; Jing Lu; Ying Wang; Zhenwen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Genetic Diversity and Societally Important Disparities.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan T L Kang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The National DNA Data Bank of Canada: a Quebecer perspective.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Marie M J Lecomte; Hugo Germain; Frank Crispino
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Human-Genetic Ancestry Inference and False Positives in Forensic Familial Searching.

Authors:  Alyssa Lyn Fortier; Jaehee Kim; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  The influence of relatives on the efficiency and error rate of familial searching.

Authors:  Rori V Rohlfs; Erin Murphy; Yun S Song; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.