| Literature DB >> 20738860 |
Maria Teresa Valenti1, Sandro Giannini, Luca Donatelli, Mirko Zanatta, Francesco Bertoldo, Stefania Sella, Maria Teresa Vilei, Elena Ossi, Giuseppe Realdi, Vincenzo Lo Cascio, Luca Dalle Carbonare.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of risedronate (Ris) in the modulation of bone formation in rats with glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis by histomorphometric, immunohistochemical and gene expression analyses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20738860 PMCID: PMC2945066 DOI: 10.1186/ar3122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Histomorphometric results in rats treated with glucocorticoids (GC) and risedronate (Ris)
| Controls | Ris | GC | GC+Ris | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone volume/tissue volume (%) | 35 ± 1 | 39 ± 1(b,c) | 31 ± 1(b) | 36 ± 1(a) |
| Trabecular thickness (μm) | 50 ± 1 | 55 ± 1(b) | 43 ± 1(b) | 53 ± 1(a) |
| Trabecular number (N/mm) | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.1(b) | 2.9 ± 0.1(b) | 4.4 ± 0.1(a,b) |
| Trabecular separation (μm) | 155 ± 6.5 | 139 ± 4.8(b,c) | 273 ± 5.3(b) | 144 ± 6.1(a) |
| Mineral apposition rate (μm/day) | 0.66 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.05(b) | 0.65 ± 0.04 |
| Mineralized surface/BS (%) | 11.2 ± 1.5 | 9.8 ± 0.9(b) | 9.6 ± 0.9(b) | 9.8 ± 1.0(b) |
| Bone formation rate/BS (μm3/μm2/day | 7.4 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 0.6(b) | 5.9 ± 0.6(b) | 6.3 ± 0.6(b) |
| Wall thickness (μm) | 16.8 ± 1.3 | 24.9 ± 3.6(b) | 12.0 ± 3.1(b) | 22.8 ± 5.9(a,b) |
| Activation frequency (N/yr) | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2(b) | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 1.0 ± 0.3(a,b) |
| Active formation period (days) | 25.4 ± 2.0 | 38.8 ± 5.4(b) | 19.4 ± 4.8 | 35.3 ± 9.3(a,b) |
| Eroded surface/BS (%) | 1.9 ± 1.0 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 1.9 ± 1.1 |
BS, bone surface.
a) P < 0.001 vs GC. b) P < 0.05/P < 0.001 vs controls. c) P < 0.001 vs GC + Ris.
All values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 1Osteocyte apoptosis (TUNEL) in rats treated with risedronate (Ris) and glucocorticoids (GC). TUNEL positive apoptotic cells with respect to total cells expressed as percentage were quantified in randomly selected six microscopic fields (200 μm square, each) under 40 × magnification. * P < 0.001 vs GC; # P < 0.001 vs GC +Ris.
Figure 2COX-2 expression in osteocytes of treated rats. COX-2 positive osteocytes in rats treated with risedronate (Ris) and glucocorticoids (GC). Results were expressed as Immuno-Hystochemical Score, IHS), based on German Immunoreactive. * P < 0.001 vs controls; # P < 0.001 vs GC; § P < 0.001 vs GC+Ris.
Figure 3Viability values in bone marrow stromal cells. Difference of viability (XTT test) with respect to controls expressed in percentage in bone marrow stromal cells treated with risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations, with or without NS-398 COX-2 inhibitor (a) and with dexametasone 1 μM (DEX) (b) with or without risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Figure 4Viability values in MLO-y4 osteocyte cell line. Difference of viability (XTT test) expressed in percentage in MLO-y4 osteocytes treated with dexametasone 1 μM (DEX), with or without risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations. In the right side of the figure are also reported the effects on viability of risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations with or without NS-398 COX-2 inhibitor. The addition of NS-398 limited cell viability increased by Ris. This effect was significant at the highest concentration of Ris. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Figure 5. (a)COX-2 gene expression of bone marrow stromal cells treated with risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations (0.1 to 10 μM) in presence or absence of NS-398 COX-2 inhibitor. Note that Ris induces significant COX-2 expression in a dose dependent manner. (b)COX-2 gene expression of bone marrow stromal cells treated with risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations (0.1 to 10 μM) in presence of dexametasone 1 μM (DEX). (c)bALP gene expression of bone marrow stromal cells treated with risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations in presence or absence of NS-398 COX-2 inhibitor. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Figure 6. COX-2 (a) and b-ALP (b) gene expression in MLO-y4 osteocytes treated with dexametasone 1 μM (DEX), with or without risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations. In the right side of the figure are also reported the effects on gene expression of risedronate (Ris) at different concentrations with or without NS-398 COX-2 inhibitor. Risedronate upregulated the gene expression in a dose dependant manner and reduced the downregulation of gene expression induced by dexametasone. The addition of NS-398 inhibitor significantly reduced the expression of COX-2 (P < 0.05/0.001) and b-ALP (P < 0.005) increased by Ris. The experiments were performed in triplicate.