Literature DB >> 20738786

Pollinator behaviour and plant speciation: can assortative mating and disruptive selection maintain distinct floral morphs in sympatry?

Paul D Rymer1, Steven D Johnson, Vincent Savolainen.   

Abstract

• Pollinators, as gene flow vectors and selection agents, play a central role in the origin and maintenance of floral variation in natural populations. However, it is debatable whether pollination alone can complete the speciation process in sympatry. • Mating patterns and phenotypic selection on floral traits were characterized over two flowering seasons for sympatric corolla tube length morphs of the hawkmoth-pollinated iris Gladiolus longicollis. A mating model with genetic and spatial-temporal predictors was developed to identify seed paternity. A multivariate analysis was used to estimate selection on correlated floral traits based on maternal and paternal fitness. • Mating patterns among floral morphs were density dependent, resulting in assortative mating at low plant densities, and random mating among morphs at high densities. Weak disruptive selection on tube length was detected in one season for maternal fitness. Plant height was under opposing directional selection for maternal (+) and paternal (-) fitness functions. • These results indicate that G. longicollis morphs will introgress rather than diverge towards speciation. The lack of strong assortative mating, particularly at high densities, is predicted to result in the loss of rare morphs within populations, and indicates that spatial and temporal co-occurrences of floral morphs are evolutionarily unstable.
© The Authors (2010). Journal compilation © New Phytologist Trust (2010).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20738786     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  6 in total

1.  Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Rod Peakall; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The interaction between sex-specific selection and local adaptation in species without separate sexes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Jessica K Abbott; Crispin Y Jordan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids.

Authors:  Elodie Chapurlat; Iris Le Roncé; Jon Ågren; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross-pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity.

Authors:  Violeta I Simón-Porcar; A Jesús Muñoz-Pajares; Alejandra de Castro; Juan Arroyo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 10.323

6.  Pollinator-mediated selection on floral size and tube color in Linum pubescens: Can differential behavior and preference in different times of the day maintain dimorphism?

Authors:  Merav Lebel; Uri Obolski; Lilach Hadany; Yuval Sapir
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.