Literature DB >> 20738685

Landscape genetic patterns of the rainbow darter Etheostoma caeruleum: a catchment analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences and nuclear microsatellites.

A E Haponski1, T L Bollin, M A Jedlicka, C A Stepien.   

Abstract

Catchment population structure and divergence patterns of the rainbow darter Etheostoma caeruleum (Percidae: Teleostei), an eastern North American benthic fish, are tested using a landscape genetics approach. Allelic variation at eight nuclear DNA microsatellite loci and two mitochondrial DNA regions [cytochrome (cyt) b gene and control region; 2056 aligned base pairs (bp)] is analysed from 89 individuals and six sites in the Lake Erie catchment (Blanchard, Chagrin, Cuyahoga and Grand Rivers) v. the Ohio River catchment (Big Darby Creek and Little Miami River). Genetic and geographic patterning is assessed using phylogenetic trees, pair-wise F(ST) analogues, AMOVA partitioning, Mantel regression, Bayesian assignment, 3D factorial correspondence and barrier analyses. Results identify 34 cyt b haplotypes, 22 control region haplotypes and 137 microsatellite alleles whose distributions demonstrate marked genetic divergence between populations from the Lake Erie and Ohio River catchments. Etheostoma caeruleum populations in the Lake Erie and Ohio River catchments diverged c. 1.6 mya during the Pleistocene glaciations. Greater genetic separations characterize the Ohio River populations, reflecting their older habitat age and less recent connectivity. Divergence levels within the Lake Erie catchment denote more recent post-glacial origins. Notably, the western Lake Erie Blanchard River population markedly differs from the three central basin tributary samples, which are each genetically distinguishable using microsatellites. Overall relationships among the Lake Erie sites refute a genetic isolation by geographic distance hypothesis. Etheostoma caeruleum populations thus exchange few genes and have low migration among tributaries and catchments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20738685     DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02414.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  7 in total

1.  Comparative riverscape genetics reveals reservoirs of genetic diversity for conservation and restoration of Great Plains fishes.

Authors:  Megan J Osborne; Joshuah S Perkin; Keith B Gido; Thomas F Turner
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Hierarchical analysis of genetic structure in the habitat-specialist Eastern Sand Darter (Ammocrypta pellucida).

Authors:  Robert Ginson; Ryan P Walter; Nicholas E Mandrak; Courtney L Beneteau; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Genome-wide diversity and habitat underlie fine-scale phenotypic differentiation in the rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum).

Authors:  Daniel R Oliveira; Brendan N Reid; Sarah W Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Genome-wide SNPs redefines species boundaries and conservation units in the freshwater mussel genus Cyprogenia of North America.

Authors:  Kyung Seok Kim; Kevin J Roe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparative riverscape genomics of the rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) in glaciated and unglaciated environments.

Authors:  Jon M Luiken; Tony Gamble; Peter B Berendzen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  A population genetic window into the past and future of the walleye Sander vitreus: relation to historic walleye and the extinct "blue pike" S. v. "glaucus".

Authors:  Amanda E Haponski; Carol A Stepien
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Incongruence between mtDNA and nuclear data in the freshwater mussel genus Cyprogenia (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and its impact on species delineation.

Authors:  Jer Pin Chong; John L Harris; Kevin J Roe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.