Literature DB >> 20738479

Liver size reveals social status in the African cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher.

N M Sopinka1, J L Fitzpatrick, J K Desjardins, K A Stiver, S E Marsh-Rollo, S Balshine.   

Abstract

Wild groups (n = 167) of the cooperatively breeding Lake Tanganyika cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher, were used to investigate how social status and sex influence liver investment. In contrast to expectations, males and females (controlling for body size) had similar liver investment and subordinates (both sexes) had relatively larger livers compared with dominants. Three hypotheses were considered for why social status results in liver size disparity: liver mass might reflect status-dependent differences in (1) energy expenditure, (2) energy storage and (3) energy acquisition. First, dominants performed more energetically costly behaviours (e.g. social policing and care) compared with subordinates, supporting the notion that energy expenditure drives liver investment. Moreover, dominants in large groups (with many subordinates to monitor) and those holding multiple territories (with large areas to patrol), tended to have smaller livers. Second, subordinates did not appear to use the liver as a strategic energy storage organ. In laboratory and field experiments, subordinates ascending in rank had similar or larger livers during periods of rapid growth compared with non-ascending controls. Third, although subordinates fed more frequently than dominants, a negative relationship was found between feeding rates and liver size. Hence, these results contrast with previous liver studies and suggest that liver investment patterns were linked to status-driven differences in energy expenditure but not to energy intake or storage in N. pulcher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20738479     DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02234.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  10 in total

1.  Social buffering of stress in a group-living fish.

Authors:  Brett M Culbert; Kathleen M Gilmour; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effects of familiarity and social hierarchy on group membership decisions in a social fish.

Authors:  Lyndon A Jordan; Marian Y L Wong; Sigal S Balshine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Brain nonapeptide levels are related to social status and affiliative behaviour in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish.

Authors:  Adam R Reddon; Constance M O'Connor; Susan E Marsh-Rollo; Sigal Balshine; Magdalena Gozdowska; Ewa Kulczykowska
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Experimental evidence that intruder and group member attributes affect outgroup defence and associated within-group interactions in a social fish.

Authors:  Ines Braga Goncalves; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Intragroup social dynamics vary with the presence of neighbors in a cooperatively breeding fish.

Authors:  Jennifer K Hellmann; Ian M Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Pipefish embryo oxygenation, survival, and development: egg size, male size, and temperature effects.

Authors:  Malin Nygård; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Ingrid Ahnesjö; Ines Braga Goncalves
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Experimental evidence that chronic outgroup conflict reduces reproductive success in a cooperatively breeding fish.

Authors:  Ines Braga Goncalves; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Facial Recognition in a Group-Living Cichlid Fish.

Authors:  Masanori Kohda; Lyndon Alexander Jordan; Takashi Hotta; Naoya Kosaka; Kenji Karino; Hirokazu Tanaka; Masami Taniyama; Tomohiro Takeyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Congruent geographic variation in saccular otolith shape across multiple species of African cichlids.

Authors:  Aneesh P H Bose; Holger Zimmermann; Georg Winkler; Alexandra Kaufmann; Thomas Strohmeier; Stephan Koblmüller; Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Impacts of additional noise on the social interactions of a cooperatively breeding fish.

Authors:  Ines Braga Goncalves; Emily Richmond; Harry R Harding; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.