RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Pre-discharge occupational therapy home assessments are common practice, and considered important for falls prevention in older people. This prospective, observational cohort study describes the association between pre-discharge home assessment and falls in the first month post-discharge from a rehabilitation hospital. METHODS: 342 inpatients were recruited and followed up 1 month post-discharge. Patients were classified into diagnostic groups (cardiac, orthopaedic trauma, spinal, peripheral joint surgery, neurological and deconditioned). Age, gender, falls risk [Falls Risk Assessment Scoring System (FRASS)], functional independence scores (FIM™) and receipt (or not) of a home assessment were recorded. Patients completed a diary to document post-discharge falls. Logistic regression analysis tested the effect on falling of receiving a home assessment, age, gender, diagnostic group, FRASS and FIM™. RESULTS: Considering all subjects, not receiving a home assessment increased the risk of falling 1 month post-discharge [odds ratio (OR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.7, P=0.003]. Neurological and orthopaedic trauma patients had significantly elevated risks of falling [OR (95% CI), respectively, 12.5 (4.7-33.2), 3.4 (1.4-8.4)] relative to the orthopaedic joint group. For all diagnostic groups except neurological, falls risk was mitigated by a home assessment. In non-neurological patients, adjusting for the effect of diagnostic group, FRASS and FIM™ scores indicated a significant association between not receiving a home assessment and falling (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.1-8.2, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-discharge occupational therapy home assessments are sound post-discharge falls-prevention strategies in non-neurological patients. The decision to conduct a home assessment should consider diagnosis, falls risk and functional independence.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Pre-discharge occupational therapy home assessments are common practice, and considered important for falls prevention in older people. This prospective, observational cohort study describes the association between pre-discharge home assessment and falls in the first month post-discharge from a rehabilitation hospital. METHODS: 342 inpatients were recruited and followed up 1 month post-discharge. Patients were classified into diagnostic groups (cardiac, orthopaedic trauma, spinal, peripheral joint surgery, neurological and deconditioned). Age, gender, falls risk [Falls Risk Assessment Scoring System (FRASS)], functional independence scores (FIM™) and receipt (or not) of a home assessment were recorded. Patients completed a diary to document post-discharge falls. Logistic regression analysis tested the effect on falling of receiving a home assessment, age, gender, diagnostic group, FRASS and FIM™. RESULTS: Considering all subjects, not receiving a home assessment increased the risk of falling 1 month post-discharge [odds ratio (OR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.7, P=0.003]. Neurological and orthopaedic traumapatients had significantly elevated risks of falling [OR (95% CI), respectively, 12.5 (4.7-33.2), 3.4 (1.4-8.4)] relative to the orthopaedic joint group. For all diagnostic groups except neurological, falls risk was mitigated by a home assessment. In non-neurological patients, adjusting for the effect of diagnostic group, FRASS and FIM™ scores indicated a significant association between not receiving a home assessment and falling (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.1-8.2, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-discharge occupational therapy home assessments are sound post-discharge falls-prevention strategies in non-neurological patients. The decision to conduct a home assessment should consider diagnosis, falls risk and functional independence.
Authors: Natalie E Leland; Pedro Gozalo; Julie Bynum; Vincent Mor; Thomas J Christian; Joan M Teno Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Natalie E Leland; Pedro Gozalo; Thomas J Christian; Julie Bynum; Vince Mor; Terrie F Wetle; Joan M Teno Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.983