Literature DB >> 20738011

Evaluation of multiple neurotoxic outcomes in cancer chemotherapy.

Bernard Weiss1.   

Abstract

Although it is now clear that cognitive dysfunction is a common accompaniment of cancer chemotherapy, its implications await further research and direction. Most of the clinical research relies on standard neuropsychological tests that were developed to diagnose stable traits. Cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing treatment varies with time, however. Its dimensions will vary during the course of treatment, which generally consists of cycles of drug administration followed by recovery periods. To effectively determine the connection between chemotherapy and cognitive function requires neuropsychological tests based on performance, so that they can be administered repeatedly at specified times during the entire course of treatment and beyond. A number of computerized test batteries, many of which have been developed for environmental neurotoxicology, are now available that fit such criteria. Moreover, cognitive impairment is only one aspect of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. A full appreciation of its scope requires assessment of sensory functions such as vision, audition and somatosensory properties and assessment of motor function. A program of research based on animal models is also essential. Only with animal models is it possible to determine dose-response relationships and to couple behavioral with mechanistic indices such as neuroplasticity. Animal behavior models play a vital role in environmental toxicology because, from them, it is possible to derive some index of exposure that limits adverse effects. However, as in human testing, it is critical to choose situations whose properties remain stable over long periods of time so as to trace the time course of neurotoxicity. Schedule-controlled operant behavior offers the most promising source of animal models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20738011      PMCID: PMC3787700          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6306-2_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  51 in total

Review 1.  Color vision and occupational chemical exposures: I. An overview of tests and effects.

Authors:  Anders Iregren; Marléne Andersson; Per Nylén
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  Neuropsychological effects of low mercury vapor exposure in chloralkali workers.

Authors:  D G Ellingsen; R Bast-Pettersen; J Efskind; Y Thomassen
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Impaired cued delayed alternation behavior in adult rat offspring following exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on gestation day 15.

Authors:  Vincent P Markowski; Christopher Cox; Raymond Preston; Bernard Weiss
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 4.  The impact of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer on cognitive function: current evidence and directions for research.

Authors:  Hope S Rugo; Tim Ahles
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Detecting dementia: novel neuropsychological markers of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Andrew D Blackwell; Barbara J Sahakian; Robyn Vesey; James M Semple; Trevor W Robbins; John R Hodges
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 2.959

6.  Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.

Authors:  M Christopher Newland; Phyllis A Reile; Jeffrey L Langston
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  Grading of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity using the Total Neuropathy Scale.

Authors:  G Cavaletti; G Bogliun; L Marzorati; A Zincone; M Piatti; N Colombo; G Parma; A Lissoni; F Fei; S Cundari; C Zanna
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Development of the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS) to detect and characterize neurotoxicity in humans.

Authors:  Diane S Rohlman; Lincoln S Gimenes; David A Eckerman; Seong-Kyu Kang; Fayssal M Farahat; W Kent Anger
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 9.  Cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy for cancer: report of a workshop.

Authors:  Ian F Tannock; Tim A Ahles; Patricia A Ganz; Frits S Van Dam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Apartment residents' and day care workers' exposures to tetrachloroethylene and deficits in visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Judith S Schreiber; H Kenneth Hudnell; Andrew M Geller; Dennis E House; Kenneth M Aldous; Michael S Force; Karyn Langguth; Elizabeth J Prohonic; Jean C Parker
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Social medicine assessment of patients with prostate cancer].

Authors:  W Hoffmann; W Vahlensieck; D-H Zermann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  5-Fluorouracil chemotherapy upregulates cytokines and alters hippocampal dendritic complexity in aged mice.

Authors:  Thomas R Groves; Ryan Farris; Julie E Anderson; Tyler C Alexander; Frederico Kiffer; Gwendolyn Carter; Jing Wang; Marjan Boerma; Antiño R Allen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A clinically relevant dose of cyclophosphamide chemotherapy impairs memory performance on the delayed spatial alternation task that is sustained over time as mice age.

Authors:  Michelle C Janelsins; Charles E Heckler; Bryan D Thompson; Robert A Gross; Lisa A Opanashuk; Deborah A Cory-Slechta
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 4.  Breast cancer medications and vision: effects of treatments for early-stage disease.

Authors:  Alvin Eisner; Shiuh-Wen Luoh
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.424

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.