Literature DB >> 20737639

The effect of dryer load on freeze drying process design.

Sajal M Patel1, Feroz Jameel, Michael J Pikal.   

Abstract

Freeze-drying using a partial load is a common occurrence during the early manufacturing stages when insufficient amounts of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are available. In such cases, the immediate production needs are met by performing lyophilization with less than a full freeze dryer load. However, it is not obvious at what fractional load significant deviations from full load behavior begin. The objective of this research was to systematically study the effects of variation in product load on freeze drying behavior in laboratory, pilot and clinical scale freeze-dryers. Experiments were conducted with 5% mannitol (high heat and mass flux) and 5% sucrose (low heat and mass flux) at different product loads (100%, 50%, 10%, and 2%). Product temperature was measured in edge as well as center vials with thermocouples. Specific surface area (SSA) was measured by BET gas adsorption analysis and residual moisture was measured by Karl Fischer. In the lab scale freeze-dryer, the molar flux of inert gas was determined by direct flow measurement using a flowmeter and the molar flux of water vapor was determined by manometric temperature measurement (MTM) and tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) techniques. Comparative pressure measurement (capacitance manometer vs. Pirani) was used to determine primary drying time. For both 5% mannitol and 5% sucrose, primary drying time decreases and product temperature increases as the load on the shelves decreases. No systematic variation was observed in residual moisture and vapor composition as load decreased. Further, SSA data suggests that there are no significant freezing differences under different load conditions. Independent of dryer scale, among all the effects, variation in radiation heat transfer from the chamber walls to the product seems to be the dominant effect resulting in shorter primary drying time as the load on the shelf decreases (i.e., the fraction of edge vials increases).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20737639     DOI: 10.1002/jps.22132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  5 in total

1.  Determination of end point of primary drying in freeze-drying process control.

Authors:  Sajal M Patel; Takayuki Doen; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Emerging freeze-drying process development and scale-up issues.

Authors:  Sajal Manubhai Patel; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation-2021 Part I: Process Design and Modeling.

Authors:  Feroz Jameel; Alina Alexeenko; Akhilesh Bhambhani; Gregory Sacha; Tong Zhu; Serguei Tchessalov; Lokesh Kumar; Puneet Sharma; Ehab Moussa; Lavanya Iyer; Rui Fang; Jayasree Srinivasan; Ted Tharp; Joseph Azzarella; Petr Kazarin; Mehfouz Jalal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Demonstrating Functional Equivalence of Pilot and Production Scale Freeze-Drying of BCG.

Authors:  R Ten Have; K Reubsaet; P van Herpen; G Kersten; J-P Amorij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification.

Authors:  Feroz Jameel; Alina Alexeenko; Akhilesh Bhambhani; Gregory Sacha; Tong Zhu; Serguei Tchessalov; Puneet Sharma; Ehab Moussa; Lavanya Iyer; Sumit Luthra; Jayasree Srinivasan; Ted Tharp; Joseph Azzarella; Petr Kazarin; Mehfouz Jalal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.