Literature DB >> 20737480

Small deletions but not methylation underlie CDKN2A/p16 loss of expression in conventional osteosarcoma.

Alexander B Mohseny1, Chris Tieken, Pieter A van der Velden, Karoly Szuhai, Carlos de Andrea, Pancras C W Hogendoorn, Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen.   

Abstract

Conventional osteosarcoma is characterized by rapid growth, high local aggressiveness, and metastasizing potential. Patients developing lung metastases experience poor prognosis despite extensive chemotherapy regimens and surgical interventions. Previously we identified a subgroup of osteosarcoma patients with loss of CDKN2A/p16 protein expression in the primary tumor biopsies which was significantly predictive of a very poor prognosis. Here we aimed to identify the underlying mechanism(s) of this protein loss in relation to osteosarcoma behavior. The CDKN2A locus was analyzed in osteosarcoma cases with total loss of CDKN2A/p16 expression and in cases with high protein expression using melting curve analysis-methylation assay (MCA-Meth), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and mutation analysis. All cases with complete CDKN2A/p16 protein loss showed homozygous deletions at the CDKN2A locus. In none of the cases hyper methylation of the promoter region was seen which was confirmed by sequencing this region. Taken together we show that large or smaller deletions of the CDKN2A locus are evident in patient samples and underlie the CDKN2A/p16 protein expression loss while promoter methylation does not appear to be a mechanism of this expression loss. Genomic loss of CDKN2A instead of promoter methylation might be a plausible explanation for the rapid proliferation and high aggressiveness of osteosarcoma by simultaneous impairment CDKN2A/p14(ARF) function.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20737480     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  19 in total

Review 1.  Molecular genetics of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Kirby Rickel; Fang Fang; Jianning Tao
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Adult NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms of the viscera: with an emphasis on rare locations and heterologous elements.

Authors:  Jen-Wei Tsai; Jen-Chieh Lee; Tsung-Han Hsieh; Shih-Chiang Huang; Pei-Hang Lee; Ting-Ting Liu; Yu-Chien Kao; Ching-Di Chang; Te-Fu Weng; Chien-Feng Li; Jung-Chia Lin; Cher-Wei Liang; Yu-Li Su; Ian Yi-Feng Chang; Yu-Ting Wang; Nien-Yi Chang; Shih-Chen Yu; Jui-Chu Wang; Hsuan-Ying Huang
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 8.209

3.  Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Cancer-Susceptibility Genes in Patients With Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Lisa Mirabello; Bin Zhu; Roelof Koster; Eric Karlins; Michael Dean; Meredith Yeager; Matthew Gianferante; Logan G Spector; Lindsay M Morton; Danielle Karyadi; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Smita Bhatia; Lei Song; Nathan Pankratz; Maisa Pinheiro; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Richard Gorlick; Silvia Regina Caminada de Toledo; Antonio S Petrilli; Ana Patino-Garcia; Fernando Lecanda; Miriam Gutierrez-Jimeno; Massimo Serra; Claudia Hattinger; Piero Picci; Katia Scotlandi; Adrienne M Flanagan; Roberto Tirabosco; Maria Fernanda Amary; Nilgün Kurucu; Inci Ergurhan Ilhan; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Donald A Barkauskas; Gerardo Mejia-Baltodano; Patricia Valverde; Belynda D Hicks; Bin Zhu; Mingyi Wang; Amy A Hutchinson; Margaret Tucker; Joshua Sampson; Maria T Landi; Neal D Freedman; Susan Gapstur; Brian Carter; Robert N Hoover; Stephen J Chanock; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Osteosarcoma models: from cell lines to zebrafish.

Authors:  Alexander B Mohseny; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2012-03-15

5.  The genetics of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jeff W Martin; Jeremy A Squire; Maria Zielenska
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2012-05-20

6.  Clinical next generation sequencing of pediatric-type malignancies in adult patients identifies novel somatic aberrations.

Authors:  Jorge Galvez Silva; Fernando F Corrales-Medina; Ossama M Maher; Nizar Tannir; Winston W Huh; Michael E Rytting; Vivek Subbiah
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2015-02-20

7.  Kinome and mRNA expression profiling of high-grade osteosarcoma cell lines implies Akt signaling as possible target for therapy.

Authors:  Marieke L Kuijjer; Brendy E W M van den Akker; Riet Hilhorst; Monique Mommersteeg; Emilie P Buddingh; Massimo Serra; Horst Bürger; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Genetically engineered mouse models and human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Alvin Jm Ng; Anthony J Mutsaers; Emma K Baker; Carl R Walkley
Journal:  Clin Sarcoma Res       Date:  2012-10-04

9.  Exome sequencing of osteosarcoma reveals mutation signatures reminiscent of BRCA deficiency.

Authors:  Michal Kovac; Claudia Blattmann; Sebastian Ribi; Jan Smida; Nikola S Mueller; Florian Engert; Francesc Castro-Giner; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Monika Kovacova; Andreas Krieg; Dimosthenis Andreou; Per-Ulf Tunn; Hans Roland Dürr; Hans Rechl; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Ingo Melcher; Stefan Burdach; Andreas Kulozik; Katja Specht; Karl Heinimann; Simone Fulda; Stefan Bielack; Gernot Jundt; Ian Tomlinson; Jan O Korbel; Michaela Nathrath; Daniel Baumhoer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  Prognostic value of tumor suppressors in osteosarcoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bernhard Robl; Chantal Pauli; Sander Martijn Botter; Beata Bode-Lesniewska; Bruno Fuchs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.