BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemias constitute an independent risk factor for the development of atherogenesis and they also predispose to the development of endothelial dysfunction (ED). Using PET with (13)N-ammonia, it is possible to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) in mL/min/g and to quantitatively evaluate ED. With the use of lipid lowering therapy it is possible to reduce ED and increase the MBF and the endothelial-dependent vasodilation index (ENDEVI). In this study, we aimed to evaluate with (13)N-ammonia PET the benefic effects of the combined treatment ezetimibe/simvastatine on the endothelial function of dyslipidemic patients after 8 weeks of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with dyslipidemia diagnosis and 17 healthy volunteers were studied with a three phase [rest, Cold Pressor Test (CPT), and adenosine-induced hyperemia] (13)N-ammonia PET for MBF quantification assessment. A second PET study was performed in the dyslipidemic group after 8 weeks of treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatine (10/40 mg). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), ENDEVI, and %ΔMBF were calculated. RESULTS: Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides concentrations were markedly altered in the dyslipidemic group and after 8 weeks of treatment these values improved. Dyslipidemic patients showed endothelial dysfunction when compared with the control group, (MFR 2.79 ± 0.94 vs 3.15 ± 0.48, P < 0.05 ; ENDEVI 1.28 ± 0.25 vs 1.53 ± 0.24, P < 0.05; and %ΔMBF 29.08 ± 24.62 vs 53 ± 24.60%, P < 0.05, respectively). After 8 weeks of treatment, we found a significant increase in all the endothelial function markers (MFR: 3.14 ± 0.86, P < 0.05, ENDEVI 1.65 ± 0.23, P < 0.05; %ΔMBF: 65.21 ± 23.43, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dyslipidemic patients show endothelial dysfunction measured with (13)N-ammonia PET. Treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatine was effective improving the lipid profile as well as the endothelial function of these patients. PET may be a useful tool to monitor vascular reactivity and regression/progression of coronary atherosclerosis after pharmacologic interventions.
BACKGROUND:Dyslipidemias constitute an independent risk factor for the development of atherogenesis and they also predispose to the development of endothelial dysfunction (ED). Using PET with (13)N-ammonia, it is possible to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) in mL/min/g and to quantitatively evaluate ED. With the use of lipid lowering therapy it is possible to reduce ED and increase the MBF and the endothelial-dependent vasodilation index (ENDEVI). In this study, we aimed to evaluate with (13)N-ammonia PET the benefic effects of the combined treatment ezetimibe/simvastatine on the endothelial function of dyslipidemic patients after 8 weeks of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with dyslipidemia diagnosis and 17 healthy volunteers were studied with a three phase [rest, Cold Pressor Test (CPT), and adenosine-induced hyperemia] (13)N-ammonia PET for MBF quantification assessment. A second PET study was performed in the dyslipidemic group after 8 weeks of treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatine (10/40 mg). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), ENDEVI, and %ΔMBF were calculated. RESULTS: Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides concentrations were markedly altered in the dyslipidemic group and after 8 weeks of treatment these values improved. Dyslipidemic patients showed endothelial dysfunction when compared with the control group, (MFR 2.79 ± 0.94 vs 3.15 ± 0.48, P < 0.05 ; ENDEVI 1.28 ± 0.25 vs 1.53 ± 0.24, P < 0.05; and %ΔMBF 29.08 ± 24.62 vs 53 ± 24.60%, P < 0.05, respectively). After 8 weeks of treatment, we found a significant increase in all the endothelial function markers (MFR: 3.14 ± 0.86, P < 0.05, ENDEVI 1.65 ± 0.23, P < 0.05; %ΔMBF: 65.21 ± 23.43, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dyslipidemic patients show endothelial dysfunction measured with (13)N-ammonia PET. Treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatine was effective improving the lipid profile as well as the endothelial function of these patients. PET may be a useful tool to monitor vascular reactivity and regression/progression of coronary atherosclerosis after pharmacologic interventions.
Authors: John Deanfield; Ann Donald; Claudio Ferri; Cristina Giannattasio; Julian Halcox; Sean Halligan; Amir Lerman; Giuseppe Mancia; James J Oliver; Achille C Pessina; Damiano Rizzoni; Gian Paolo Rossi; Antonio Salvetti; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Stefano Taddei; David J Webb Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: O T Raitakari; O P Pitkänen; T Lehtimäki; S Lahdenperä; H Iida; S Ylä-Herttuala; J Luoma; K Mattila; T Nikkari; M R Taskinen; J S Viikari; J Knuuti Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Claude Gagné; Harold E Bays; Stuart R Weiss; Pedro Mata; Katherine Quinto; Michael Melino; Meehyung Cho; Thomas A Musliner; Barry Gumbiner Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: R H Knopp; H Gitter; T Truitt; H Bays; C V Manion; L J Lipka; A P LeBeaut; R Suresh; B Yang; E P Veltri Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: K L Gould; D Ornish; L Scherwitz; S Brown; R P Edens; M J Hess; N Mullani; L Bolomey; F Dobbs; W T Armstrong Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-09-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Simone Maschauer; Kristin Michel; Philipp Tripal; Katrin Büther; Torsten Kuwert; Otmar Schober; Klaus Kopka; Burkhard Riemann; Olaf Prante Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-09-19
Authors: Seoyoung C Kim; Marcelo F Di Carli; Rajesh K Garg; Kathleen Vanni; Penny Wang; Alyssa Wohlfahrt; Zhi Yu; Fengxin Lu; Anarosa Campos; Courtney F Bibbo; Stacy Smith; Daniel H Solomon Journal: BMC Rheumatol Date: 2018-06-20