Literature DB >> 20737116

Catch-per-unit-effort: which estimator is best?

M Petrere1, H C Giacomini, P De Marco.   

Abstract

In this paper we examine the accuracy and precision of three indices of catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE). We carried out simulations, generating catch data according to six probability distributions (normal, Poisson, lognormal, gamma, delta and negative binomial), three variance structures (constant, proportional to effort and proportional to the squared effort) and their magnitudes (tail weight). The Jackknife approach of the index is recommended, whenever catch is proportional to effort or even under small deviations from proportionality assumption, when a ratio estimator is to be applied and little is known about the underlying behaviour of variables, as is the case for most fishery studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20737116     DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842010005000010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Biol        ISSN: 1519-6984            Impact factor:   1.651


  2 in total

1.  Patterns of catch and trophic signatures illustrate diverse management requirements of coastal fisheries in Solomon Islands.

Authors:  Patrick Smallhorn-West; Jan van der Ploeg; Delvene Boso; Meshach Sukulu; Janet Leamae; Mathew Isihanua; Martin Jasper; Janet Saeni-Oeta; Margaret Batalofo; Grace Orirana; Alick Konamalefo; Jill Houma; Hampus Eriksson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Multispecies Fisheries in the Lower Amazon River and Its Relationship with the Regional and Global Climate Variability.

Authors:  Walter Hugo Diaz Pinaya; Francisco Javier Lobon-Cervia; Pablo Pita; Ronald Buss de Souza; Juan Freire; Victoria Judith Isaac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.