Hans U Rothen1, Kay H Stricker, Daren K Heyland. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. hrothen@insel.ch
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Family satisfaction in the ICU reflects the extent to which perceived needs and expectations of family members of critically ill patients are met by healthcare professionals. Here, we present recently developed tools to assess family satisfaction, with a special focus on their psychometric properties. Assessing family satisfaction, however, is not of much use if it is not followed by interpretation of the results and, if needed, consecutive measures to improve care of the patients and their families, or improvement in communication and decision-making. Accordingly, this review will outline recent findings in this field. Finally, possible areas of future research are addressed. RECENT FINDINGS: To assess family satisfaction in the ICU, several domains deserve attention. They include, among others, care of the patient, counseling and emotional support of family members, information and decision-making. Overall, communication between physicians or nurses and members of the family remains a key topic, and there are many opportunities to improve. They include not only communication style, timing and appropriate wording but also, for example, assessments to see if information was adequately received and also understood. Whether unfulfilled needs of individual members of the family or of the family as a social system result in negative long-term sequels remains an open question. SUMMARY: Assessing and analyzing family satisfaction in the ICU ultimately will support healthcare professionals in their continuing effort to improve care of critically ill patients and their families.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Family satisfaction in the ICU reflects the extent to which perceived needs and expectations of family members of critically illpatients are met by healthcare professionals. Here, we present recently developed tools to assess family satisfaction, with a special focus on their psychometric properties. Assessing family satisfaction, however, is not of much use if it is not followed by interpretation of the results and, if needed, consecutive measures to improve care of the patients and their families, or improvement in communication and decision-making. Accordingly, this review will outline recent findings in this field. Finally, possible areas of future research are addressed. RECENT FINDINGS: To assess family satisfaction in the ICU, several domains deserve attention. They include, among others, care of the patient, counseling and emotional support of family members, information and decision-making. Overall, communication between physicians or nurses and members of the family remains a key topic, and there are many opportunities to improve. They include not only communication style, timing and appropriate wording but also, for example, assessments to see if information was adequately received and also understood. Whether unfulfilled needs of individual members of the family or of the family as a social system result in negative long-term sequels remains an open question. SUMMARY: Assessing and analyzing family satisfaction in the ICU ultimately will support healthcare professionals in their continuing effort to improve care of critically illpatients and their families.
Authors: Mary S McKenzie; Catherine L Auriemma; Jennifer Olenik; Elizabeth Cooney; Nicole B Gabler; Scott D Halpern Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: David Y Hwang; Daniel Yagoda; Hilary M Perrey; Tara M Tehan; Mary Guanci; Lillian Ananian; Paul F Currier; J Perren Cobb; Jonathan Rosand Journal: J Neurosci Nurs Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.230
Authors: Paloma Ferrando; Doug W Gould; Emma Walmsley; Alvin Richards-Belle; Ruth Canter; Steven Saunders; David A Harrison; Sheila Harvey; Daren K Heyland; Lisa Hinton; Elaine McColl; Annette Richardson; Michael Richardson; Stephen E Wright; Kathryn M Rowan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Veronica Ka Wai Lai; Anna Lee; Patricia Leung; Chun Hung Chiu; Ka Man Ho; Charles David Gomersall; Malcolm John Underwood; Gavin Matthew Joynt Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 2.692