OBJECTIVES: Posttraumatic arthritis is a major cause of disability. Current clinical imaging modalities are unable to reliably evaluate articular cartilage damage before surface breakdown, when potentially reversible changes are occurring. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a nondestructive imaging technology that can detect degenerative changes in articular cartilage with an intact surface. This study tests the hypothesis that OCT detects acute articular cartilage injury after impact at energy levels resulting in chondrocyte death and microstructural changes, but insufficient to produce macroscopic surface damage. METHODS: Bovine osteochondral cores underwent OCT imaging and were divided into a control with no impact or were subjected to low (0.175 J) or moderate (0.35 J) energy impact. Cores were reimaged with OCT after impact and the OCT signal intensity quantified. A ratio of the superficial to deep layer intensities was calculated and compared before and after impact. Chondrocyte viability was determined 1 day after impact followed by histology and polarized microscopy. RESULTS: Macroscopic changes to the articular surface were not observed after low and moderate impact. The OCT signal intensity ratio demonstrated a 27% increase (P = 0.006) after low impact and a 38% increase (P = 0.001) after moderate impact. Cell death increased by 150% (P < 0.001) and 200% (P < 0.001) after low and moderate energy impacts, respectively. When compared with unimpacted controls, both Mankin histology and David-Vaudey polarized microscopy scores increased (P = 0.036 and P = 0.002, respectively) after moderate energy impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that OCT detects acute cartilage changes after impact injury at levels insufficient to cause visible damage to the articular surface but sufficient to cause chondrocyte death and microscopic matrix damage. This finding supports the use of OCT to detect microstructural subsurface cartilage damage that is poorly visualized with conventional imaging.
OBJECTIVES:Posttraumatic arthritis is a major cause of disability. Current clinical imaging modalities are unable to reliably evaluate articular cartilage damage before surface breakdown, when potentially reversible changes are occurring. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a nondestructive imaging technology that can detect degenerative changes in articular cartilage with an intact surface. This study tests the hypothesis that OCT detects acute articular cartilage injury after impact at energy levels resulting in chondrocyte death and microstructural changes, but insufficient to produce macroscopic surface damage. METHODS:Bovine osteochondral cores underwent OCT imaging and were divided into a control with no impact or were subjected to low (0.175 J) or moderate (0.35 J) energy impact. Cores were reimaged with OCT after impact and the OCT signal intensity quantified. A ratio of the superficial to deep layer intensities was calculated and compared before and after impact. Chondrocyte viability was determined 1 day after impact followed by histology and polarized microscopy. RESULTS: Macroscopic changes to the articular surface were not observed after low and moderate impact. The OCT signal intensity ratio demonstrated a 27% increase (P = 0.006) after low impact and a 38% increase (P = 0.001) after moderate impact. Cell death increased by 150% (P < 0.001) and 200% (P < 0.001) after low and moderate energy impacts, respectively. When compared with unimpacted controls, both Mankin histology and David-Vaudey polarized microscopy scores increased (P = 0.036 and P = 0.002, respectively) after moderate energy impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that OCT detects acute cartilage changes after impact injury at levels insufficient to cause visible damage to the articular surface but sufficient to cause chondrocyte death and microscopic matrix damage. This finding supports the use of OCT to detect microstructural subsurface cartilage damage that is poorly visualized with conventional imaging.
Authors: Joseph Borrelli; Kevin Tinsley; William M Ricci; Meghan Burns; Irene E Karl; Richard Hotchkiss Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Constance R Chu; Diana Lin; Jessica L Geisler; Charleen T Chu; Freddie H Fu; Yingtian Pan Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004 Apr-May Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Constance R Chu; Ashley A Williams; Robin V West; Yongxian Qian; Freddie H Fu; Bao H Do; Stephen Bruno Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Shaowei Wang; Xiaochun Wei; Jingming Zhou; Jing Zhang; Kai Li; Qian Chen; Richard Terek; Braden C Fleming; Mary B Goldring; Michael G Ehrlich; Ge Zhang; Lei Wei Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Paul Cernohorsky; Aimee C Kok; Daniel Martijn de Bruin; Martin J Brandt; Dirk J Faber; Gabrielle J Tuijthof; Gino M Kerkhoffs; Simon D Strackee; Ton G van Leeuwen Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Florence de Bont; Nicolai Brill; Robert Schmitt; Markus Tingart; Björn Rath; Thomas Pufe; Holger Jahr; Sven Nebelung Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 3.411