Literature DB >> 20736456

Immunoblastic morphology but not the immunohistochemical GCB/nonGCB classifier predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the RICOVER-60 trial of the DSHNHL.

German Ott1, Marita Ziepert, Wolfram Klapper, Heike Horn, Monika Szczepanowski, Heinz-Wolfram Bernd, Christoph Thorns, Alfred C Feller, Dido Lenze, Michael Hummel, Harald Stein, Hans-Konrad Müller-Hermelink, Matthias Frank, Martin-Leo Hansmann, Thomas F E Barth, Peter Möller, Sergio Cogliatti, Michael Pfreundschuh, Norbert Schmitz, Lorenz Trümper, Markus Loeffler, Andreas Rosenwald.   

Abstract

The survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients varies considerably, reflecting the molecular diversity of tumors. In view of the controversy whether cytologic features, immunohistochemical markers or gene expression signatures may capture this molecular diversity, we investigated which features provide prognostic information in a prospective trial in the R-CHOP treatment era. Within the cohort of DLBCLs patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL), we tested the prognostic impact of IB morphology in 949 patients. The expression of immunohistochemical markers CD5, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR, interferon regulatory factor-4/multiple myeloma-1 (IRF4/MUM1), and Ki-67 was assessed in 506 patients. Expression of the immunohistochemical markers tested was of modest, if any, prognostic relevance. Moreover, the Hans algorithm using the expression patterns of CD10, BCL6, and interferon regulatory factor-4/multiple myeloma-1 failed to show prognostic significance in the entire cohort as well as in patient subgroups. IB morphology, however, emerged as a robust, significantly adverse prognostic factor in multivariate analysis, and its diagnosis showed a good reproducibility among expert hematopathologists. We conclude, therefore, that IB morphology in DLBCL is likely to capture some of the adverse molecular alterations that are currently not detectable in a routine diagnostic setting, and that its recognition has significant prognostic power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736456     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  50 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive B-cell lymphomas: a review of new and old entities in the WHO classification.

Authors:  Elaine S Jaffe; Stefania Pittaluga
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2011

2.  Prognostic value of immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sukjoong Oh; Dong Hoe Koo; Cheolwon Suh; Shin Kim; Bong Hee Park; Joon Kang; Jooryung Huh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  A Cancer and Leukemia Group B multi-center study of DA-EPOCH-rituximab in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with analysis of outcome by molecular subtype.

Authors:  Wyndham H Wilson; Sin-Ho Jung; Pierluigi Porcu; David Hurd; Jeffrey Johnson; S Eric Martin; Myron Czuczman; Raymond Lai; Jonathan Said; Amy Chadburn; Dan Jones; Kieron Dunleavy; George Canellos; Andrew D Zelenetz; Bruce D Cheson; Eric D Hsi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  New Challenges in the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Christopher R Flowers; Loretta J Nastoupil; Leon Bernal-Mizrachi; Adam C Rose; Rajni Sinha
Journal:  Treat Strategies Hematol       Date:  2012-01

5.  Biological characterization of adult MYC-translocation-positive mature B-cell lymphomas other than molecular Burkitt lymphoma.

Authors:  Sietse M Aukema; Markus Kreuz; Christian W Kohler; Maciej Rosolowski; Dirk Hasenclever; Michael Hummel; Ralf Küppers; Dido Lenze; German Ott; Christiane Pott; Julia Richter; Andreas Rosenwald; Monika Szczepanowski; Carsten Schwaenen; Harald Stein; Heiko Trautmann; Swen Wessendorf; Lorenz Trümper; Markus Loeffler; Rainer Spang; Philip M Kluin; Wolfram Klapper; Reiner Siebert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Accurate classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma into germinal center and activated B-cell subtypes using a nuclease protection assay on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Lisa M Rimsza; George Wright; Mark Schwartz; Wing C Chan; Elaine S Jaffe; Randy D Gascoyne; Elias Campo; Andreas Rosenwald; German Ott; James R Cook; Raymond R Tubbs; Rita M Braziel; Jan Delabie; Tom P Miller; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Different biological risk factors in young poor-prognosis and elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  H Horn; M Ziepert; M Wartenberg; A M Staiger; T F E Barth; H-W Bernd; A C Feller; W Klapper; C Stuhlmann-Laeisz; M Hummel; H Stein; D Lenze; S Hartmann; M-L Hansmann; P Möller; S Cogliatti; M Pfreundschuh; L Trümper; M Loeffler; B Glass; N Schmitz; G Ott; A Rosenwald
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  The histological classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Yi Xie; Stefania Pittaluga; Elaine S Jaffe
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.851

9.  Treatment Strategies for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Rajni Sinha; Loretta Nastoupil; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Blood Lymphat Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 10.  Next-generation prognostic assessment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Jean L Koff; Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.