Literature DB >> 20736320

Differences between human and rat intestinal and hepatic bisphenol A glucuronidation and the influence of alamethicin on in vitro kinetic measurements.

Christopher S Mazur1, John F Kenneke, Janet K Hess-Wilson, John C Lipscomb.   

Abstract

The extent to which membrane-disrupting agents, such as alamethicin, may alter cofactor transport and influence in vitro kinetic measurements of glucuronidation is a major concern regarding the characterization and extrapolation of inter- and intraspecies pharmacokinetics of bisphenol A (BPA). An additional concern is the omission of a BPA intestinal metabolism component in current pharmacokinetic models used to assess oral exposure. In this study, BPA glucuronidation in native hepatic microsomes from female rat and female human liver displayed higher V(max) values than that in males. In the presence of alamethicin, all hepatic V(max) values increased; however, this increase was disproportionately greater in males and gender differences were no longer observed. Female rats exhibited a much higher K(m) than all other species and genders; the addition of alamethicin had little influence on K(m) values for any of the test systems. The dissimilar K(m) measured for female rat suggests that different UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzyme(s) are involved in BPA glucuronidation. The presence of different UGTs in female rat was confirmed using Hill coefficients measured from diclofenac-mediated chemical inhibition assays within hepatic microsomes and purified human UGT2B7 and UGT2B15. Mixed-gender human intestinal microsomes showed little BPA glucuronidation reactivity compared with those from male rat intestine. Male rat intestinal microsomes in the presence of alamethicin exhibited a V(max) that was nearly 30-fold higher than that for mixed human microsomes. The species and gender metabolic differences we observed between rat and human liver and intestine provide key information for delineating BPA pharmacokinetics needed for human health risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736320     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.034819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  10 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Improving Metabolism Predictions for In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolation.

Authors:  Marjory Moreau; Pankajini Mallick; Marci Smeltz; Saad Haider; Chantel I Nicolas; Salil N Pendse; Jeremy A Leonard; Matthew W Linakis; Patrick D McMullen; Rebecca A Clewell; Harvey J Clewell; Miyoung Yoon
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 2.  Critical evaluation of key evidence on the human health hazards of exposure to bisphenol A.

Authors:  J G Hengstler; H Foth; T Gebel; P-J Kramer; W Lilienblum; H Schweinfurth; W Völkel; K-M Wollin; U Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Unraveling bisphenol A pharmacokinetics using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Yang; Jeffrey W Fisher
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  Influence of Bisphenol A on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Donatella Paola Provvisiero; Claudia Pivonello; Giovanna Muscogiuri; Mariarosaria Negri; Cristina de Angelis; Chiara Simeoli; Rosario Pivonello; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Derivation of a Human In Vivo Benchmark Dose for Bisphenol A from ToxCast In Vitro Concentration Response Data Using a Computational Workflow for Probabilistic Quantitative In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolation.

Authors:  George Loizou; Kevin McNally; Alicia Paini; Alex Hogg
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Sex-specific effects of bisphenol A on the signaling pathway of ESRRG in the human placenta†.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zou; Lynda K Harris; Karen Forbes; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.161

7.  Differential effects of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on human, rat and mouse fetal leydig cell function.

Authors:  Thierry N'Tumba-Byn; Delphine Moison; Marlène Lacroix; Charlotte Lecureuil; Laëtitia Lesage; Sophie M Prud'homme; Stéphanie Pozzi-Gaudin; René Frydman; Alexandra Benachi; Gabriel Livera; Virginie Rouiller-Fabre; René Habert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Should oral gavage be abandoned in toxicity testing of endocrine disruptors?

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Wade V Welshons; Frederick S Vom Saal; Pierre-Louis Toutain; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of the Bisphenols BPA, BPS, BPF, and BPAF with New Experimental Metabolic Parameters: Comparing the Pharmacokinetic Behavior of BPA with Its Substitutes.

Authors:  Cecile Karrer; Thomas Roiss; Natalie von Goetz; Darja Gramec Skledar; Lucija Peterlin Mašič; Konrad Hungerbühler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Bisphenols Threaten Male Reproductive Health via Testicular Cells.

Authors:  Elikanah Olusayo Adegoke; Md Saidur Rahman; Myung-Geol Pang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.