Literature DB >> 20736266

Donor-recipient age matching improves years of graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

Wai H Lim1, Sean Chang, Steve Chadban, Scott Campbell, Hannah Dent, Graeme R Russ, Stephen P McDonald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Donor and recipient age in kidney transplantation are known to affect graft and patient survival. In deceased-donor (DD) transplantation, donor and recipient age matching are being increasingly accepted as part of the kidney allocation programme. The aims of this study are to evaluate the effect of donor and recipient age on transplant outcomes and to determine the effect of changing existing allocation criteria to allocation based on age matching of donors and recipients on total graft years of function.
METHODS: Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, all DD kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand between 1991 and 2006 were analysed (n = 4616). Outcomes analysed were overall graft failure, death with functioning graft and serum creatinine. We calculated the mean time to graft loss ('years of graft function') for donor and recipient age cut-offs as 60 and 55 years, respectively, over up to 16 years follow-up. We then examined the gain in graft years if all older kidneys were allocated to older recipients.
RESULTS: Older donors were associated with higher risk of overall graft failure [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.45, 2.21 and HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.53, respectively] at 1-8 years post-transplant and higher serum creatinine at 1 and 5 years post-transplant (mean differences 32.74 micromol/L, 95% CI 27.60, 37.89 and 38.17 micromol/L, 95% CI 27.58, 48.77, respectively). Overall, young and old recipients with young donor kidneys have an additional two to three mean graft years compared to those receiving older donor kidneys.
CONCLUSION: Donor and recipient age matching is an effective method of organ allocation to improve total graft years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736266     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  9 in total

1.  Mortality among Younger and Older Recipients of Kidney Transplants from Expanded Criteria Donors Compared with Standard Criteria Donors.

Authors:  Maggie K M Ma; Wai H Lim; Jonathan C Craig; Graeme R Russ; Jeremy R Chapman; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Enhanced significance of donor-recipient age gradient as a prognostic factor of graft outcome in living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Milljae Shin; Jae Berm Park; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Jae-Won Joh; Suk-Koo Lee; Sung-Joo Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Effects of Aging on Kidney Graft Function, Oxidative Stress and Gene Expression after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Rui Ding; Xiangmei Chen; Di Wu; Ribao Wei; Quan Hong; Suozhu Shi; Zhong Yin; Linlin Ma; Yuansheng Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparative survival and economic benefits of deceased donor kidney transplantation and dialysis in people with varying ages and co-morbidities.

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Kirsten Howard; Jeremy R Chapman; Steven Chadban; Nicholas Cross; Allison Tong; Angela C Webster; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nonimmunologic Donor-Recipient Pairing, HLA Matching, and Graft Loss in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Vinson; Bryce A Kiberd; Roger B Davis; Karthik K Tennankore
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-12-19

6.  Age at Time of Kidney Transplantation as a Predictor for Mortality, Graft Loss and Self-Rated Health Status: Results From the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nadine Beerli; Kris Denhaerynck; Isabelle Binet; Suzan Dahdal; Michael Dickenmann; Delaviz Golshayan; Karine Hadaya; Uyen Huynh-Do; Aurelia Schnyder; Sabina M De Geest; Oliver Mauthner
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 7.  Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection and Possible Anti-Proliferative Drug Targets.

Authors:  Adnan Bashir Bhatti; Muhammad Usman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-11-06

8.  Renal Transplants from Older Deceased Donors: Use of Preimplantation Biopsy and Differential Allocation to Dual or Single Kidney Transplant according to Histological Score Has No Advantages over Allocation to Single Kidney Transplant by Simple Clinical Indication.

Authors:  Costanza Casati; Valeriana Giuseppina Colombo; Marialuisa Perrino; Ornella Marina Rossetti; Marialuisa Querques; Alessandro Giacomoni; Agnese Binaggia; Giacomo Colussi
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2018-05-16

9.  Renal transplants from older deceased donors: Is pre-implantation biopsy useful? A monocentric observational clinical study.

Authors:  Giacomo Colussi; Costanza Casati; Valeriana Giuseppina Colombo; Mario Livio Pietro Camozzi; Fabio Rosario Salerno
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.