| Literature DB >> 20735861 |
Hua Yu1, Caixiang Xie1, Jingyuan Song1, Yingqun Zhou1,2, Shilin Chen1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many medicinal plants are increasingly endangered due to overexploitation and habitat destruction. To provide reliable references for conservation planning and regional management, this study focuses on large-scale distribution prediction of Rheum tanguticum Maxim. ex Balf (Dahuang).Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20735861 PMCID: PMC2940885 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-5-31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Figure 1Native habitats of . ex Balf Blue plotsin 26 towns were set up for the extraction of target variables.
Variables extracted from the native habitats of Rheum tanguticum Maxim. ex Balf based on TCMGIS-II combined geographic, climate and soil type databases
| Variable | Unit | Range | Mean ± SE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation | m | 1980, 4550 | 3630 ± 44 | 191.2*** | 17.4 |
| Relative humidity | % | 54.8, 69.0 | 63.7 ± 2.2 | 219.3*** | 49.6 |
| Sunshine duration | hr/yr | 1897, 2704 | 2450 ± 13 | 301.7*** | 7.6 |
| Annual precipitation | mm | 331, 839 | 574 ± 7 | 233.2*** | 17.5 |
| Accumulated temperature | °C | 3193, 22451 | 9517 ± 951 | 277.1*** | 143.4 |
| Mean annual temperature | °C | 5.1, 13.1 | 8.6 ± 0.1 | 92.6*** | 16.7 |
| Mean March temperature | °C | -8.0, -2.0 | -4.5 ± 0.2 | 42.3*** | 63.8 |
| Minimum temperature | °C | -24.8, -10.6 | -19.1 ± 0.2 | 165.8*** | 15.0 |
| Maximum temperature | °C | 12.9, 24.4 | 17.2 ± 0.2 | 119.5*** | 16.7 |
| Mean minimum temperature | °C | -15.6, -5.1 | -11.2 ± 0.2 | 129.8*** | 25.6 |
| Mean maximum temperature | °C | 6.0, 18.2 | 10.4 ± 0.2 | 103.3*** | 27.6 |
| Soil type* | pH | 5.9, 8.5 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 112.4*** | 21.1 |
* Soil type was assigned according to soil grade division in TCMGIS-II program.
Values of pH were employed as an indicator of soil types for statistical analysis.
F-value indicates the difference in target variable extracted from different native habitats (*** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, and * P < 0.05).
SE: standard error of means
C: coefficient of variation
Figure 2Plot of component scores determined by principal component analysis on target variables from the native habitats of . ex Balf PC indicates a principal component.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of . ex Balf predicted by TCMGIS-II. (a) Favorable area with similarity rate ≥95% and (b) suitable area with similarity rate 90-95%. Longitude (°E) and latitude (°N) are given.
Figure 4Detailed distribution of . ex Balf predicted by TCMGIS-II in China. Favorable area with similarity rate ≥95% (dark) and the suitable area with similarity rate 90-95% (hatched).
Figure 5Distribution map of rhubarb generated based on the database of resource survey. The red dots show that there existed the wild resources of R. tanguticum in the counties. Longitude (°E) and latitude (°N) are given.
Figure 6Comparison between the distribution counties of . ex Balfpredicted by TCMGIS-II and recorded by the survey data. Latticed: the counties of survey data in prediction result. Left hatched: those of prediction results without survey data. Right hatched: those of survey data beyond prediction results. The percentage and number of counties in each part are given.