BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drugs used clinically usually have a primary mechanism of action, but additional effects on other biological targets can contribute to their effects. A potentially useful additional target is the endocannabinoid metabolizing enzyme monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL). We have screened a range of drugs for inhibition of MGL and compared the observed potencies using different MGL enzyme assays. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: MGL activity was screened using recombinant human MGL (cell lysates and purified enzyme) with 4-nitrophenyl acetate (NPA) as substrate. 2-Oleolyglycerol metabolism by rat cerebellar cytosolic MGL and by recombinant MGL was also investigated. KEY RESULTS: Among the 96 compounds screened in the NPA assay, troglitazone, CP55,940, N-arachidonoyl dopamine and AM404 inhibited NPA hydrolysis by the lysates with IC(50) values of 1.1, 4.9, 0.78 and 3.1µM, respectively. The potency for troglitazone is in the same range as its primary pharmacological activity, activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ. Among PPARγ ligands, the potency order towards human MGL was troglitazone > ciglitazone > rosiglitazone > 15-deoxy-Δ(12,14) -prostaglandin J(2) ≈ CAY 10415 > CAY 10514. In contrast to the time-dependent inhibitor JZL184, the potency of troglitazone was dependent upon the enzyme assay system used. Thus, troglitazone inhibited rat cytosolic 2-oleoylglycerol hydrolysis less potently (IC(50) 41µM) than hydrolysis of NPA by the human MGL lysates. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: 'Hits' in screening programmes for MGL inhibitors should be assessed in different MGL assays. Troglitazone may be a useful lead for the design of novel, dual action MGL inhibitors/PPARγ activators.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drugs used clinically usually have a primary mechanism of action, but additional effects on other biological targets can contribute to their effects. A potentially useful additional target is the endocannabinoid metabolizing enzyme monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL). We have screened a range of drugs for inhibition of MGL and compared the observed potencies using different MGL enzyme assays. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: MGL activity was screened using recombinant humanMGL (cell lysates and purified enzyme) with 4-nitrophenyl acetate (NPA) as substrate. 2-Oleolyglycerol metabolism by rat cerebellar cytosolic MGL and by recombinant MGL was also investigated. KEY RESULTS: Among the 96 compounds screened in the NPA assay, troglitazone, CP55,940, N-arachidonoyl dopamine and AM404 inhibited NPA hydrolysis by the lysates with IC(50) values of 1.1, 4.9, 0.78 and 3.1µM, respectively. The potency for troglitazone is in the same range as its primary pharmacological activity, activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ. Among PPARγ ligands, the potency order towards humanMGL was troglitazone > ciglitazone > rosiglitazone > 15-deoxy-Δ(12,14) -prostaglandin J(2) ≈ CAY 10415 > CAY 10514. In contrast to the time-dependent inhibitor JZL184, the potency of troglitazone was dependent upon the enzyme assay system used. Thus, troglitazone inhibited rat cytosolic 2-oleoylglycerol hydrolysis less potently (IC(50) 41µM) than hydrolysis of NPA by the humanMGL lysates. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: 'Hits' in screening programmes for MGL inhibitors should be assessed in different MGL assays. Troglitazone may be a useful lead for the design of novel, dual action MGL inhibitors/PPARγ activators.
Authors: Satish Kathuria; Silvana Gaetani; Darren Fegley; Fernando Valiño; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Marco Mor; Giorgio Tarzia; Giovanna La Rana; Antonio Calignano; Arcangela Giustino; Maria Tattoli; Maura Palmery; Vincenzo Cuomo; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-12-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Hans Gühring; May Hamza; Marina Sergejeva; Mehmet Ates; Carolin E Kotalla; Catherine Ledent; Kay Brune Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: T P Dinh; D Carpenter; F M Leslie; T F Freund; I Katona; S L Sensi; S Kathuria; D Piomelli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-07-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Constance J Chu; Susan M Huang; Luciano De Petrocellis; Tiziana Bisogno; Scott A Ewing; Jeffrey D Miller; Robert E Zipkin; Nives Daddario; Giovanni Appendino; Vincenzo Di Marzo; J Michael Walker Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-02-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Kasem Nithipatikom; Michael P Endsley; Adam W Pfeiffer; John R Falck; William B Campbell Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Ran Cheng; Wakana Mori; Longle Ma; Mireille Alhouayek; Akiko Hatori; Yiding Zhang; Daisuke Ogasawara; Gengyang Yuan; Zhen Chen; Xiaofei Zhang; Hang Shi; Tomoteru Yamasaki; Lin Xie; Katsushi Kumata; Masayuki Fujinaga; Yuji Nagai; Takafumi Minamimoto; Mona Svensson; Lu Wang; Yunfei Du; Mary Jo Ondrechen; Neil Vasdev; Benjamin F Cravatt; Christopher Fowler; Ming-Rong Zhang; Steven H Liang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 7.446