AIMS: Physical activity (PA) has positive effects on bone accrual and geometry in children during growth. However, we do not know how PA influences adaptations in bone architecture during growth. We evaluated the contribution of PA to bone density, architecture and strength in adolescents. METHODS: We used HR-pQCT (XtremeCT, Scanco Medical) to assess cross-sectional moments of inertia [Imin, Imax (mm⁴)], total bone density (Tt.Dn, mg HA/cm³), total bone area (Tt.Ar, mm²), cortical bone density (Ct.Dn, mg HA/cm³), cortical thickness (Ct.Th, μm), trabecular bone density (Tb.Dn, mg HA/cm³), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm⁻¹) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, μm) at the distal tibia in 146 male and 132 female participants (15-20 years). We evaluated the contribution of impact loading PA (ImpactPA) and non-impact loading PA (NoimpactPA) on bone (p < 0.05). RESULTS: ImpactPA explained 10% of variance in Imin (p = 0.000), and 12% of variance in Imax (p = 0.000) in male participants. In male participants, ImpactPA explained 6% of variance in Tt.Ar (p = 0.003). In female participants, ImpactPA explained 4% of variance in Tt.Dn (p = 0.011), 5% of variance in Tb.Dn (p = 0.004) and 8% of variance in Tb.N (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that ImpactPA is significantly associated with bone architecture and bone strength in adolescent males and females.
AIMS: Physical activity (PA) has positive effects on bone accrual and geometry in children during growth. However, we do not know how PA influences adaptations in bone architecture during growth. We evaluated the contribution of PA to bone density, architecture and strength in adolescents. METHODS: We used HR-pQCT (XtremeCT, Scanco Medical) to assess cross-sectional moments of inertia [Imin, Imax (mm⁴)], total bone density (Tt.Dn, mg HA/cm³), total bone area (Tt.Ar, mm²), cortical bone density (Ct.Dn, mg HA/cm³), cortical thickness (Ct.Th, μm), trabecular bone density (Tb.Dn, mg HA/cm³), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm⁻¹) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, μm) at the distal tibia in 146 male and 132 female participants (15-20 years). We evaluated the contribution of impact loading PA (ImpactPA) and non-impact loading PA (NoimpactPA) on bone (p < 0.05). RESULTS: ImpactPA explained 10% of variance in Imin (p = 0.000), and 12% of variance in Imax (p = 0.000) in male participants. In male participants, ImpactPA explained 6% of variance in Tt.Ar (p = 0.003). In female participants, ImpactPA explained 4% of variance in Tt.Dn (p = 0.011), 5% of variance in Tb.Dn (p = 0.004) and 8% of variance in Tb.N (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that ImpactPA is significantly associated with bone architecture and bone strength in adolescent males and females.
Authors: Kathleen F Janz; Elena M Letuchy; Trudy L Burns; Shelby L Francis; Steven M Levy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Ryan C Ward; Kathleen F Janz; Elena M Letuchy; Clayton Peterson; Steven M Levy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mohamed S Zulfarina; Ahmad M Sharkawi; Zaris-Sm Aqilah-S N; Sabarul-Afian Mokhtar; Shuid A Nazrun; Isa Naina-Mohamed Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 1.429