Literature DB >> 20734408

Anatomical analysis of turgescent and semi-dry resurrection plants: the effect of sample preparation on the sample, resolution, and image quality of X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT).

Nikola Korte1, Stefan Porembski.   

Abstract

Computer tomography has been used frequently for the 3-D visualization of plant anatomical traits but sample preparation has been widely neglected. Without any preparation smaller (i.e., up to 1 × 1 cm(2) ) turgescent or semi-dry plant samples (especially leaf samples) diminish the image quality of a scan due to gradual water loss and therefore constant movement. A suitable preparation for scans of turgescent and semi-dry plant samples with a high resolution μCT (<1-5 μm) has to be very thin, heat-resistant (up to 35°C), have a low attenuation coefficient, and should not alter the water content and structure of the sample. Several agents have been tested, but only a coating with vaseline conserved the water content of a plant sample efficiently. However, water molecules and vaseline both attenuate the X-ray beam, which decreases the image quality of scans of turgescent or semi-dry plant samples. Therefore, trade-offs between the spatial resolution, sample water content, sample size, and image quality have to be considered: larger samples have to be placed further away from the X-ray tube, which leads to a lower spatial resolution; water and preparation agents attenuate the X-ray beam, causing low-quality images which may be accompanied by motion artifacts compared to a scan of a dry sample, where no preparation is necessary.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afrotrilepis pilosa; desiccation-tolerant plants; plant anatomy; vaseline

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20734408     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  3 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional anatomy and biomechanics of a living dragon tree.

Authors:  Linnea Hesse; Tom Masselter; Jochen Leupold; Nils Spengler; Thomas Speck; Jan Gerrit Korvink
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Preparation, Scanning and Analysis of Duckweed Using X-Ray Computed Microtomography.

Authors:  Dylan H Jones; Brian S Atkinson; Alexander Ware; Craig J Sturrock; Anthony Bishopp; Darren M Wells
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Plant tissues in 3D via X-ray tomography: simple contrasting methods allow high resolution imaging.

Authors:  Yannick M Staedler; David Masson; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.