Literature DB >> 20734188

Evaluating guidelines for critical care: a need for detail.

Peter Q Eichacker1, Charles Natanson2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20734188     DOI： 10.1007/s00134-010-1978-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN： 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The effect of clinical practice guidelines on variations in care.

Authors:  L Gundersen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit.

Authors:  Joan Vlayen; Bert Aertgeerts; Karin Hannes; Walter Sermeus; Dirk Ramaekers
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night.

Authors:  Terrence M Shaneyfelt; Robert M Centor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care.

Authors:  Tasnim Sinuff; Rakesh V Patel; Neill K J Adhikari; Maureen O Meade; Holger J Schünemann; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 17.440
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.