Literature DB >> 20733520

Agonist-antagonist paired set resistance training: a brief review.

Daniel W Robbins1, Warren B Young, David G Behm, Warren R Payne.   

Abstract

Agonist-antagonist paired set (APS) training refers to the coupling of agonist and antagonist exercises, performed in an alternating manner with rest intervals between each set. The purpose of this review is to identify the proposed benefits and possible underlying mechanisms of APS training and to suggest how APS training may be exploited. Furthermore, areas deserving of further research attention will be presented. This review will also suggest a common terminology (i.e., APS training) for describing training modalities that alternate agonist and antagonist exercises. Although somewhat equivocal, evidence exists supporting the use of APS as a means of enhancing short-term power measures. Evidence also exists suggesting APS training is an efficacious and efficient means of developing strength and power. Time-efficient methods of developing strength and power would have benefits for athletes and the general population. Athletes able to spend less time developing strength and power would have more time to devote to other aspects of performance or other unrelated tasks. The general population may be more willing to adhere to less time-consuming resistance training programs that offer similar results, as compared to more time-consuming programs. This review concludes that the practical applicability of APS training in terms of acute performance enhancement is limited. However, the use of APS training as an efficacious and time-effective method for developing strength and power may hold some merit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20733520     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f00bfc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  The effects of traditional, superset, and tri-set resistance training structures on perceived intensity and physiological responses.

Authors:  Jonathon J S Weakley; Kevin Till; Dale B Read; Gregory A B Roe; Joshua Darrall-Jones; Padraic J Phibbs; Ben Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume.

Authors:  Guillermo Peña García-Orea; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Daniel Segarra-Carrillo; Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto; Noelia Belando-Pedreño
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Maximal repetition performance, rating of perceived exertion, and muscle fatigue during paired set training performed with different rest intervals.

Authors:  Marianna de Freitas Maia; Gabriel Andrade Paz; Humberto Miranda; Vicente Lima; Claudio Melibeu Bentes; Jefferson da Silva Novaes; Patrícia Dos Santos Vigário; Jeffrey Michael Willardson
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.103

4.  Hypotensive Responses of Reciprocal Supersets versus Traditional Resistance Training in Apparently Healthy Men.

Authors:  Claudio M Bentes; Pablo B Costa; Victor G Corrêa Neto; Roberto Simão; Gabriel A Paz; Marianna F Maia; Tiago Figueiredo; Gabriel R Neto; Jefferson S Novaes; Humberto Miranda
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 5.  No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vegard M Iversen; Martin Norum; Brad J Schoenfeld; Marius S Fimland
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 11.928

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.