Literature DB >> 20733428

Prenatally diagnosed clubfeet: comparing ultrasonographic severity with objective clinical outcomes.

Michael P Glotzbecker1, Judy A Estroff, Samantha A Spencer, Justin C Bosley, Richard B Parad, James R Kasser, Susan T Mahan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in obstetric sonography (US) have led to an increased prenatal detection of clubfoot, but studies have not been able to correlate sonographic severity to clinical deformity at birth. The purpose of this study was to decrease the false positive (FP) rate for prenatally identified clubfeet, and to predict clinical severity using a new prenatal sonographic classification system.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified all pregnant patients referred to the fetal care center at our institution for a diagnosis of clubfoot between 2002 and 2007. A total of 113 fetuses were identified. Follow-up information was available for 107 fetuses (95%). Out of 107 fetuses, 17 were terminated or died shortly after birth. Seven patients had normal studies or were not seen at our center. Out of 83 patients, 42 had an US available for rereview. A novel sonographic severity scale for clubfoot (mild/moderate/severe) was assigned by a radiologist specializing in prenatal US to each fetus based on specific anatomic features. The prenatal sonographic scores were then assessed with respect to final postnatal clinical diagnosis and to clinical severity.
RESULTS: None of the pregnancies were terminated because of an isolated diagnosis of clubfoot. Of the remaining 83 fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of at least 1 clubfoot, 67 had a clubfoot documented at birth (FP=19%). A foot classified as "mild" on prenatal US was significantly less likely to be a true clubfoot at birth than when a "moderate" or "severe" diagnosis was given (Odds Ratio=21, P<0.0001). If "mild" clubfoot patients were removed from the analysis, our FP rate decreased to 3/42. For a subgroup in which postnatal DiMeglio scoring was available, prenatal sonographic stratification of clubfoot did not relate to postnatal clinical severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with this novel sonographic scoring system showed improved detection of a true clubfoot prenatally and a decrease in the FP rate. An isolated "mild" clubfoot diagnosed on a prenatal sonogram is less likely to be a clubfoot at birth; this will have substantial impact on prenatal counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Diagnostic Study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20733428     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e78e4e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging clues in the prenatal diagnosis of syndromes and aneuploidy.

Authors:  Judy A Estroff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  Prenatal screening for clubfoot: what factors predict prenatal detection?

Authors:  Susan T Mahan; Mahsa M Yazdy; James R Kasser; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus in Bogota (Colombia) Between 2003 and 2012.

Authors:  Pablo Rosselli; Sergio Nossa; Elina Huérfano; Germán Betancur; Yuli Guzmán; Cristal Castellanos; Jose Morcuende
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Congenital Clubfoot: Early Recognition and Conservative Management for Preventing Late Disabilities.

Authors:  Yubin Liu; Dahang Zhao; Li Zhao; Hai Li; Xuan Yang
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Prospective evaluation of parental anxiety related to newborn foot disorder.

Authors:  S T Mahan; P E Miller; C J May; J R Kasser
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  First trimester physiological development of the fetal foot position using three-dimensional ultrasound in virtual reality.

Authors:  Hein Bogers; Maria S Rifouna; Titia E Cohen-Overbeek; Anton H J Koning; Sten P Willemsen; Peter J van der Spek; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Niek Exalto; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 7.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laura Ruzzini; Sergio De Salvatore; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Martina Marino; Alessandra Greco; Ilaria Piergentili; Pier Francesco Costici; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.